Why are you still using Steam?

>>716047009 (OP)
cod has wildly different fps with different matches. those are not the same matches.

waow a 10% difference

because I dont play blizzard shit

ONLY 290fps? VGH, this is why trump won

>>716047009 (OP)
cod has some of the most random fps out of any game ive ever played. shit can have a 100+ fps difference while standing in the same spot in different matches. this literally proves nothing

>>716047385
>>716047009 (OP)
anything more than 240fps is screen tearing and input tripping

>>716047009 (OP)
What are the odds that Activision is purposely lowering performance on Steam? They've been caught doing this kind of stealthy shit more than once
Also Battle net is terrible, people wonder why everyone loves steam so much when it's literally the only launcher that doesn't break your pc, I literally can't do anything on my pc while downloading games from epic games or battle net.

>>716047009 (OP)
Is this with the overlay disabled?

>>716047009 (OP)
Now let's have multiple sessions and let's see if it's consistent
I am actually curious about it lol

>>716047009 (OP)
Why would Steam cuck you fps?

>>716047009 (OP)
>he needs more than 60 fps

>>716047009 (OP)
Wattage is better on Steam for some reason. Cables might not melt playing on there.

>>716048094
good morning saar

soon new monitor technology will be available in your country so you cant use it, i recommend you get at least a 144hz 1080p monitor sir, should be less than 1000 rupees

>>716048094
good morning saar

soon new monitor technology will be available in your country so you cant use it, i recommend you get at least a 144hz 1080p monitor sir, should be less than 1000 rupees

>>716048182
>CPU power
>cables malting

i see paypigs have a really low IQ

>>716047009 (OP)
shouldve used crash 4 for a less biased example

>>716048257
>Higher temperatures
>Louder fans
>Coil whine
>All for barely imperceptible enhancement in image fidelity
I think YOU’RE the Indian trying to scam me with shit I don’t need

>>716047930
>What are the odds that Activision is purposely lowering performance on Steam? They've been caught doing this kind of stealthy shit more than once
Next to zero, I can't even imagine what you'd gain from doing something like this. Who would even notice? The only ones who would, are also the kind of people who wouldn't buy the game again to avoid arbitrary FPS loss, and would rather boycott the game.
It's more likely that the video is doctored to make Bnet look better.

>Also Battle net is terrible, people wonder why everyone loves steam so much when it's literally the only launcher that doesn't break your pc, I literally can't do anything on my pc while downloading games from epic games or battle net.
Limit your download rate, dingus.

>>716048094
There is a huge difference between 60 fps and 120 fps.

>>716048334
GPU temps are also two degrees lower than the BNET values.

And yes wattage does short out processors all the time.

>>716048494
no you dumb retard payping

wattage does not short out processors, voltage does

>>716048423
>Higher temperatures
>Louder fans
>Coil whine

are you a tech illiterate console fag that thinks your PC will explode?

>>716048640
No I’m a person who doesn’t want to play video games in a room as hot as an average day in Mumbai.

>>716047009 (OP)
It's not like you need more than 60fps.

>>716048076
Call of duty games really don't like steam overlays
The problem is in call of duty because most of the other games work fine, this kind of thing you can find very rarely only in very old games.
BO3 has it the worst because they made the game check for DLCs every second or something like that
>>716048432
>Next to zero, I can't even imagine what you'd gain from doing something like this
I wouldn't be surprised because Activision has done this kind of obscure shit numerous times. It may be insignificant here but in case of weak and medium PCs it can be significant.
Somehow every single one of their old games suddenly starts working badly when they release a new Call of duty or buying cosmetic items improves aim asist and improves connection to servers
>Limit your download rate, dingus.
It's not about download speed although it's also much worse in other lunchers.
I literally got a blue screen trying to download Fortnite and do my random stuff because Epic eats too much resources

>>716048764
>poorfag doesn't even have AC
>calls me Indian

lol

>>716048772
thats right, you need 30fps for the real cinematic experience

>>716048494
hey saucey
go eat some more shit and go back to /soc/

>>716047009 (OP)
Because I framerate limit my games to 140fps on my 144hz display and I don't play anything that isn't locked at 140fps.
Also, this thread stinks of dog fried rice.

>>716048984
NOOOOO NOT/SOC/ AGAIN FUCK

>>716049720
and how do you know what dog fried rice stinks like?

>>716049768
Ever spoken to a chinese person before?

>>716049910
No

>>716049924
Well, try it sometime. You'll understand.

>>716047619
some stupid tard would actually believe this

>>716050308
nvidia reflex is lower input lag and it doesn't work with uncapped fps

>>716048827
I bet the incessant honking of motorcycles outside drowns out the coil whine and fans, too, right? But go on. Tell me how you’re some hick from Mobile, Alabama whose great grand pappy five generations removed owned an entire plantation of niggers and show me your coat of arms, too, while you’re at it. Nigger.

>>716050504
That's true but you can have no tearing at any FPS, just use vsync or vrr. Reflex will handle the correct fps locking if you use freesync too.

>>716050628
jesus christ poorfag, an AC mounted in the window is like $150, you dont need to get so assmad..
ill paypal you 150 if you really need it to cool down you shed

>>716048825
>I wouldn't be surprised because Activision has done this kind of obscure shit numerous times. It may be insignificant here but in case of weak and medium PCs it can be significant.
>Somehow every single one of their old games suddenly starts working badly when they release a new Call of duty or buying cosmetic items improves aim asist and improves connection to servers
you missed the point anon was bringing; why would activision care enough to do this?

here's the gist; if someone has the game on steam, and it runs like shit, they'll think activision can't optimize their games and think anyone saying it runs well on their machine (whether bnet or steam) are full of shit
and if they have it on bnet, then it might run a bit better, and then what?

neither of these scenarios would involve the person dropping steam to go to bnet, unless the rumor that the game ran better on bnet was to spread, but then people wouldn't blame steam because who the fuck would do that when you're talking about activision, they'll assume activision is up to some buttfuckery as usual
but activision can't gain anything here, it's all either neutral or bad, and by neutral it's still bad because it means having engineering work figure out ways to reduce framerate when running on steam aka money to spend

it's most likely that the game is trash and people are retarded

>>716048825
>BO3 has it the worst because they made the game check for DLCs every second or something like that
someone made a fix for it, it’s called bo3 enhanced. you use the windows store version of the game’s files and replace it with the steam one. fixed it for me and plays way smoother

>>716047009 (OP)
Because battle.net has the Diablo games and nothing else. The bulk of my games are available on Steam.

>>716047009 (OP)
Fuck off blizzshill

>>716047009 (OP)
imagine playing CoD past CoD2.

>>716052972
>showing a game runs better without steam bloatware is shilling

the absolute state of stemies

>>716047009 (OP)
Why do brown people hate steam so much??

>>716053156
Steam has more brown/yellow users than white... so whats your point?

>>716053074
4, WaW, MW, MW2 and BO1 are still pure kino, fuck off boomerfaggot

>>716053501
WaW and BO1 are good for the singleplayer I agree but MW MW2 are overrated past those games it's just trash.

>>716047009 (OP)
>swapping one piece of cancer for another
how about no shitty bloated bloatware clients running in the background?
is it so hard to make a 200 KB program that just lets you run any of your games?

>>716055073
yes

>>716055958
that's not a launcher though

>>716056283
why would i need a launcher?

>>716056331
to launch games in an organized manner

>>716056453
no thanks, i will just click on the shortcut to launch my game
you zoomers are beyond any help at this point

I guess subtlety was never part of Timmy's script.

>>716056906
>its Timmy's fault that Steam is bloatware

rent free

I'm not a faggot that hates women, so I'm never gonna support the pro-LGBT women-raping company.

>>716047009 (OP)
It's me, I did this, did you that I work at blizzard? I hacked the fps dependency cave polymorphism.

>>716047124
They even have wildly different fps in different benchmark runs in the same machine and installation.

>>716056996
>Steam is bloatware
Imagine thinking that. It uses like 2% memory.

>>716048772
>source: a nigger who has never experienced more than 60 fps

human brain cant feel more than 24fps anyway

>>716047009 (OP)
just gonna vouch in, but the steam version of the game spams API calls to the steam client non stop.

>>716048094
>he needs more than 30 fps

>>716047930
Bnet is only better than steam for cod because if your steam gets disconnected like for the weekly steam maintenance it just kicks you completely from the game. Counter strike at least let's you finish the match your in if steam goes down for maintenance and just doesn't let you queue for another match