Already 7 EU parliament members came out in support of SKG and the votes haven't even been counted yet. AAA is fucked
>>716049436 (OP)Honestly I think this whole thing is a sham...
>>716049436 (OP)Volt's a bunch of muslim fucking cucks.
Honestly? This whole thing is starting to feel like Sarkeesian 2.0.
You all say it’s about ethics or accountability or consumer advocacy, but at the end of the day, it’s just another excuse to dogpile someone you don’t like. First it was “he hates Stop Killing Games,” then it’s “he cheated at Animal Well,” now it’s “he’s a furry and cried one time”? You’re not fighting for a cause. You’re flailing for reasons to justify being cruel.
Same exact tactics:
Take clips out of context
Spin every emotional reaction into “proof”
Invent some sinister hidden agenda
Make harassment sound like activism
Anita said games affected people and got doxxed for a decade. Jason said review bombing doesn't fix anything and now you want him to disappear from the internet. Only difference is the side of the aisle doing the screaming.
You turned SKG, which started as a genuinely good idea into yet another purity test. If you’re not 100% aligned with the mob, you’re evil. If you disagree publicly, you’re a grifter. If you try to defend yourself, it’s “cope.” This isn’t consumer advocacy. It’s just GamerGate with a new coat of paint.
Jason never shut down a game server. He didn’t scam anyone. He didn’t mistreat his team. He spoke up about bad-faith actors weaponizing SKG and now you’re trying to erase his whole career. What the hell is that?
You’ve taken a movement about preserving games and turned it into a harassment campaign to destroy developers.
Congrats, you’ve become the thing you claimed to fight.
>>716049436 (OP)>putting the volt logo on anythingLOL, LMAO
yet another attempt by this discord tranny party to gain any traction online
>Shills are getting desperate that they are resorting to playground level name calling
>>716050182sounds like this movement has developed into more than just "they took the crew servers down"
>>716050271At least my parents are alive
>>716050272Now we take down your company
HAHAHAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS
>>716050329You parents would be ashamed if they knew what you are doing with your life
>>716050957This post is extremely low quality
>>716051001Your mum are extremely low quality.
>>716049436 (OP)Maybe AAA companies could afford to keep servers on forever if they didn’t hire shills that can’t even do their job properly.
>>716051949They need money for other projects though.
>usb-c on apple phones
>non-detachable caps on coca cola bottles
>gdps request forms on every social media site
amerifat oligarchs BOW to the european bureauchads
>>716053234can you take us back please - britbong
>>716053234>and soon SKGEuro-sama
I kneel at your powers over corpos
>>716053631That'll be pound sterling.
>"another parliamentarian has signed the initiative"
>>716049436 (OP)I feel like the scope of this will end up being very limited, and the main offenders (Steam) won’t even be affected
>>716055404considering how lenient steamworks DRM is, Valve probably could get away with simply saying:
>"if steam ever goes down, we will release the key to the DRM"steam isnt really the main offender, because if you WANT to crack a steamworks game, you will, is piss easy, the problem is the Denuvos and the games that rely on a central server
>>716052585You mean hiring shills to shitpost on 4chan?
>PWEASE DADDY GUBMINT DO MORE HECKING WHOLESOME REGULATIONS ON MY INDUSTRY!