Excuse me anon, you HAVE signed the petition, right? You ARE European, right?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oqT0bed880

I'm not a communist.

What if you just stopped buying shitty video games?

black rock shooter supports stop killing games

>>716074624 (OP)
Miku being exposed to westoids was a mistake.

>>716074624 (OP)
teto is better than shartku

>>716074840
>>716074885
post hands brownoids

I would if I could, bitch

>>716074956
Miku was a marketing campaign to convince westerners to buy vocaloid software, retard.

>>716075789
Despite her English voice bank first being released 6 years after her debut?

>>716074624 (OP)
>You ARE European, right?

>>716074624 (OP)
>You ARE European, right?
självklart

Hi There! Would you like to sign my petition?

miku sexo

>>716074624 (OP)
I'm not European thank God.

>>716074624 (OP)
Migu isn't Eurofilth.

>>716074624 (OP)
>You ARE European, right?
Para bien y para mal

OK let's see if we can address all the common shill non-arguments:

>IT'S TOO VAGUE
Vague is good. Vague stops publishers from weaseling out of things by saying "oh well this plan wouldn't work for this one in a million example" and the whole thing getting scrapped.

>JUST DON'T BUY SHITTY GAMES
Always-online single-player WILL become industry-standard if publishers get their way, and technological advances WILL make it so that old games are not compatible with modern tech, meaning digital always-online copies WILL be the only way to play your games unless some serious efforts are made in game preservation. Sooner or later, this WILL affect a game you do like.

>BUT THE FREE MARKET SHOULD DECIDE
The free market is retarded. Many (if not most) game consumers know very little about the medium, they just want FIFA or something for their kids. Regulations have to exist because no person can be hyper-aware of every single product that they buy.

>B-BUT YOU AGREED TO THE EULA
Not enforceable in court. You cannot make an illegal transaction legal by putting it in writing, you're not allowed to kill people just because someone agreed to it in a EULA.

>THE GOVERNMENT WILL DESTROY YOUR GAMES
They're already doing that, which is exactly why we need voices in government on the side of the consumers. Publishers and feminists have been bullying the government to get their way for decades, why is it wrong for us to do the same?

>REEEEE E-CELEBS
In a perfect world we wouldn't need such scumbags to promote a cause, but we don't live in a perfect world. If you want something to get attention it has to go through people with big audiences.

>WHAT ABOUT THE COST TO PUBLISHERS AND THE POOR INDIES
If you can afford a central server for your game, you can afford to spend a bit more to ensure an end of life plan.

i dont make a habit of following anything e-celeb tells me.

>>716077616
You forgot the >muh gamergate spambot

>>716076759
I married her so she's now

>>716077616
>not allowed to kill people because someone agreed to it in a Eula.
Sure, but you can get pretty close.
https://people.com/disney-world-seeking-to-dismiss-wrongful-death-lawsuit-disney-plus-subscription-8695391
Yeah yeah
>people
But you can find more info about this suit on any site.

>>716078204
I mean that's not what that did. They argued that it must go through arbitration instead: "any dispute between You and Us, Except for Small Claims, is subject to a class action waiver and must be resolved by individual binding arbitration."
Yea it would mean not presenting infront of a jury so I guess technically but it's a stretch and Disney backed down from the tactic

>>716078204
>disney-world-seeking-to-dismiss-wrongful-death-lawsuit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twoSTbnHLl4

>>716074840
yeah, just a paid shill

>>716074624 (OP)
I would but I'm an American.

>>716078776
>Disney backed down from the tactic
Only because of the public backlash. Without the backlash they'd just have bled him dry, because american justice is not about who's right, it's about who can afford to spend the most on lawyers.

>>716074624 (OP)
I would say "buy an ad" but it was actually funny so it's ok

After SKG passes i would like to see a "Stop Killing Internet Discourse" and have it be illegal to hire pajeets and bots to shill your games in the internet, especially without disclosing who youre working for.

I want to see CEOs dragged to the streets naked and flogged if they break that law

>>716079160
Even still, there wasn't a ruling that proved that this would have worked is all I'm saying. There is a chance that the US justice system would have seen this as absurd and dismissed it.

>>716078204
>Sure, but you can get pretty close.
A judge literally threw that defense out the moment it was introduced in court

>>716079421
They'd just have dragged the case out until he had to settle or go bankrupt. The last thing they'd want is an actual ruling unless they're 9001% sure it will be in their favor.

>>716079597
What the fuck are you talking about, no they didn’t. Disney backtracked and “voluntarily waived their right to arbitration (that didn’t even exist)“ and allowed it to continue to trial solely due to public backlash.
https://floridapolitics.com/archives/691181-disney-ditches-controversial-legal-strategy-against-widowers-wrongful-death-suit/