>one of its main selling points
>not a single (zero) game implements it
How is this legal?

>>716208475 (OP)
ask sony

Pong and space invaders.

that's for 2d indie games read the small print

ackchually future-proofing is bad when consoles do it

>>716208657
No game is going to run at 120hz on that shit apart from 2D indie slop and 16bit games.

>>716208657
>Games made with the Switch in mind can't handle it
>Surely way more graphically intense Switch 2 games can
kekkarkorororroooooooooooooo

>>716208475 (OP)
Still sold more than the steam deck's entire life time sale.

>>716208958
>more brown subhumans bought my chink plastic than your chink plastic
not the flex you think it is

>>716208475 (OP)
There will be one next week: https://nintendoeverything.com/ys-x-proud-nordics-will-support-120fps-on-nintendo-switch-2-with-new-mode/

Prime 4 will have it too and Fast Fusion may add it in a patch.

>>716208475 (OP)
Prime 4 coming soon does it

>>716209000
>fast fusion 120 fps
yikes handheld mode is already full of dlss artifacts, I don't want to see how much worse it can get

>>716208475 (OP)
>>716208602
do console babbies think that framerate is purely a display hardware thing?

I thought the Splatoon 3 patch does it
I’m too happy with 60Hz@4K to try and play on the handheld directly

>>716209132
higher framerates usually hide artifacts better

>>716209156
>60Hz@4K
what game

>>716209132
They added a no DLSS mode recently though I haven't tried it yet.

>>716209139

>>716208958
nintendo has decades of brand awareness over steam, is already known for making video game consoles though. Steam is only well known amongst PC gamers which is a minority. If nintendo sold less switches than the steam deck then the company would literally be on its way out

>>716209201
Pure mode looks very pixelated and there's no anti aliasing, I definitely prefer the dlss modes

>>716208602
>8K

>>716209219
?

>>716209172
Breath of the Wild and Splatoon

>>716209415
BotW/TotK render at 1440p upscaled to 4k. Splatoon 3 is native 4k.

>>716208996
>>716209271
There's the steamie jeets cope.

>>716208958
>shitch thread
>not a single mention of the deck until a seething nintenbro brings it up
Just because the PS2 outsold the Gamecube doesn't mean the Gamecube is a bad console. Same goes for the DS and the PSP.

>>716208914
Yeah, but that 2d indie slop also looks and feels better at 120fps.
If can use it, use it.

But the fact that the screen is only fast enough to display 30hz is another discussion
T.switch 2 owner

>>716208475 (OP)
>>not a single (zero) game implements it
welcome tour does

>>716208475 (OP)
Same goes for oculus.
>picked a shitty LCD display so that it can go up to 120fps.
>no game can actually go up to 120fps
>even modded beatsaber struggles at 110fps in performance mode
>if you use it as PCVR it STILL can't go to 120fps due to streaming limitation
What an absolute fucking SCAM

>>716209793
I still don't know why the fuck they added 90hz to the deck. How is that productive towards battery life?

>>716208602
>>716209139
The worst part about this is that it can't even display 8K properly. 32Gbps and no DSC so the absolute maximum is 8K at 30Hz, not the 60Hz required by NTSC standards. There's not even a "well technically it could" gotcha, it's just a lie

>>716210706
I'd be fine with the 72fps, I know everyone's different but it's smooth enough for me when it works, but almost every game runs like shit and the video is choppy/stutters. If you look at a wall and move side to side you can see the wall jumping around because of hitching or refresh rate mismatch or whatever the fuck it is. It's bad enough when devs don't give a shit about this in flat screen games but in VR it's so much more noticeable and worse.

>>716208475 (OP)
It was used to distract from how shit the screen actually is. And it worked, you have fags running around saying 120 like it means anything other than shorter battery life.

Why would you ever want 120 to be the baseline? 60 fps is the sweet spot. If you target 120 then you have to make your game look worse than it would at a completely fine 60fps.

>>716208958
God I love how rent free the deck is. It's just proof that despite you people trying to pretend you care so much about sales as some be all end all metric of quality that deep down you know the deck is by far and away the better system. Doesn't help that throughout the switch's lifespan you were making the exact kind of arguments against the ps5 that you're now trying to make in favor of the switch 2.

>>716208996
Considering the number of /v/ posts foretelling Valve decimating Nintendo's market share, it is very much a flex.

>>716210985
You can cap the frame rate/refresh rate on the deck.

>>716210985
>90hz refresh rate
>cap game to 45fps

>>716209219
Yes, card companies exist. Your point?

>>716211076
is it definitively known that it didn't support DSC? i don't see specs for the chip anywhere.

>>716208602
>8k

>>716215296
the original 'eck could already change its refresh rate to anything from 40-60hz. the 90hz screen purely benefits low end games where you can get above 60fps.

>>716210985
Better 45fps support, which is what a lot of the heavy hitting modern games clock out around. Plus, you don't have to run it at 90, you have full control over your deck's settings.

i don't even have a monitor that can do above 1080p/60hz
what should i buy that can do 120fps and has low input lag for fightan games

>>716208475 (OP)
it was mainly to get 40fps modes working you have to be retarded if you thought this smartphone on roids can achieve 120fps in anything resembling a ps4 game

>>716208475 (OP)
No compatible games sir.

>>716208602
Technically speaking, it can run like 1 game at least at 8k I think.

Switch 2 does not support variable refresh rate.
You need a 120 hz display to be able to play Cyberpunk at 40 fps mode ob the switch 2.
Its also why DK Bananza drops to 30 fps any time it cant maintain 60 instead of just doping to like 55 or something.