Are you comfortable yet, /v/?

I own chuds instead

>>716233819 (OP)
CEOs should get comfortable with not owning a home

This company hasn't made a good game in decades. Their like the Square Enix of Europe.
Why people keep giving them money is a literal mystery to me.

It’s more like gamers are used to believing that they own their games even when they signed the terms of service saying they don’t. Doesn’t matter anyways. Look at the current state of gamers. A lot of them buy up whatever horseshit you hand them

>>716233819 (OP)
i dont think ive played a ubisoft game in 8 years

>>716234092
This is where you're wrong. I can't accept the terms until the game is purchased, and if new terms aren't agreed upon before purchase is made they don't apply to me.

>>716234065
Rayman Legends was pretty good so a decade, give or take.

>>716234065
At least Square Enix has the nostalgia factor and are playing it hard. It's not working, but they have SOMETHING. What the fuck does Ubisoft have?

>>716234237
Rayman is cool but Ubisoft barely know that this IP exists.

Do you own your digital games? Can you still play them if the platforms they're part of ever go down?

>>716233819 (OP)
No, but I'll hope they'll get comfortable with going out of business. Retarded "consumers" going along with their bullshit for so long has given them the idea that we're working for them, not the other way around.

>>716234221
So, you bought a game only to accept the terms later? Even when I’m wrong, that just means you’re a fucking retard
>>if new terms aren't agreed upon before purchase is made they don't apply to me
>he doesn’t know that the terms of service includes a clause that allows them to setup new terms
Get with the times, old man

>>716234092
By own they mean having the copy (whether physical or digital) that the developer can't take back, you fucking retard. Nobody gave a fuck about those terms of service. They're moving gaming to a subscription service to circumvent this

>>716234513
What are you on about? If the game I've just purchased has terms I don't agree with I just refund it.

>>716234561
>By own they mean having the copy (whether physical or digital) that the developer can't take back, you fucking retard
That’s what consumers like you think because you’re a retarded ape
>Nobody gave a fuck about those terms of service.
The law does and you do because your dumbass signed it
>>716234571
It doesn’t matter if you can refund it. There are still terms and conditions there saying you never owned it. It doesn’t change that fact

>>716233819 (OP)
I'm comfortable with giving ubisoft none of my money, yes.

>>716235063
>The law does and you do because your dumbass signed it
I thought Americans were asleep.

I can't remember the last time I felt compelled to replay a Ubislop game. I think I'd be fine if they all disappeared.

>>716233819 (OP)
Sure, I'll get comfortable with that once they start asking adequate prices for their digital licenses. 20-30 bucks should suffice.

Imagine actually saying something this stupid. I actually cannot picture how arrogant and borderline retarded you have to be, to speak on your company's behalf and say something this ruinously stupid. Like I'm sure it's true, I'm sure him, Ubisoft and a bunch of other AAA companies would LOVE if gamers stopped caring about ownership all together, but the fucking mongoloid brain that decided to say something this insane during an interview on the behalf of the company you work for?

At this rate the only thing Ubisoft will have is the reputation for initiating SKG.

>>716234221
>>716234561
>I can't read

>>716235940
>I can't breed

>>716234303
Rayman's creator was shown the door because he was not "good vibes only", and that is a capital crime in the DEI nest that ubislop has become.

>>716237472
So he got out with his pride intact is what you're saying. Imagine being part of modern Ubisoft.

>>716237472
Did he get a nice job somewhere else? Start his own studio perhaps?
Fuck Ubisoft, Rayman is the only almost-always consistently good thing out of that company.

What if I bury myself with a hard drive full of games and one of those games is required by law to be deleted? Stickler to rules that I am, I would like to know which government agency I should give a list of the games to so they can dig me up and remove only the one game and put everything else back in order?

>>716237989
If a law is being broken, you call the police.
An EULA is not the law, so you call no one.
Although that would make for a funny story.

>>716233819 (OP)
Okie but why isnt this new making chuds and not chuds unity to fuck with Ubisoft now?

>>716233819 (OP)
I am comfortable with Ubisoft not even owning themselves.

>>716233819 (OP)
Bump

>pirate or buy cheap keys
Never cared

>>716233819 (OP)
>playing modern games
You deserve this desu

>>716233926
arms and legs

>>716233819 (OP)
Very comfortable, I haven't bought any Ubisoft game since Anno 1800.

>>716233819 (OP)
>ubisoft
irrelevant nothing burger

>>716242965
For me it was Rayman for the ps1

Netflix is 100-250 dollars a year.
Most people got a Netflix subscription around 2012-2014.
$2000 to not own a single movie

>>716233926
Ubisoft is a CCP company in everything but name now
hope you chuds enjoy further Chinese Century domination

>>716244147
explain gamepass then

>>716243405
For 10 years of entertainment.