The absolute state of gaming journalism

PC Gamer Wuchang review: 49

They criticize "running around in underwear" and the character design to be eye-candy

the game is also just kind of bland

>reviewer is a faggot
Every single time

>>716258674

The only thing these bloggers are achieving is radicalizing a generation of young Chinamen who are being exposed to this mental illness for the first time. China will RISE UP against the oppression of gamers

>>716258303 (OP)
Wow, a Wukong sequel already? So much for quality control. It looks even *more* bland than Stellar Blade somehow. Some people just love slop slop, I guess.

>>716258303 (OP)
outrage farm all you like, I'm still not buying your chinkslop

Wumao thread

>>716260669
*Wulmao Thread [derogatory]

>>716258303 (OP)
So its 98?

>>716258303 (OP)
That's how you know their opinions aren't valid

>>716258303 (OP)
So it has a premium cosmetics shop?

>>716258303 (OP)
That's not even the lowest review score for the game! These two rank the Wuchang even lower and appear to not even mention the whole 'gooner' thing. It's just a mediocre (at best) game, apparently. More slop for the trough.

>>716262053
Looks LIKE it came from a cosmetic shop.
read nigga read
Anyway, here's the GAMER's review.

>>716258303 (OP)
It doesn't say "in underwear". It says "MY underwear". Important distinction. The guy is a self insert nutcase.

>>716262459
if you even, ever admit that there is seriously something called "The Male Gaze" you can't really be trusted to discuss Prog-Lefty woke shit as anything but an adherent trying to muddy the waters and gaslight.

>>716262346
I have never heard of these 2 outlets.

>>716258303 (OP)
>>716262459
>which it will have on launch
lmao nice try shill, read nigga read

>>716262459
I think I've cracked it.. why they are like this.

these paragraphs have enlightened me, the secret to their madness on wanting to de-sex everything (I know why they people who wrote their ideology do, but not these fuckers, the conveyor belt end product)

its right here.. they feel a phantom, completely made up invisible malicious entity/idea laughing at them and trying to make them suffer and is also revels in their suffering.

it invades the games they play, they project it on the people that oppose them socially politically, this manufactured, completely dreamt demon they see in things, ruins things for them.

they basically say as such in this very post here, at the end.

illuminating.. fascinating.

>>716258303 (OP)
Maybe they're right and it's just more soulsslop? I'm not going to pay a premium price just because I can view a 3D model of a woman in her underwear.

>>716258303 (OP)
they aren't journalists, so stop calling them that.

I was vaguely interested but now I am certain that this disrespectful corporation has paid for shills to shit up /v/ with culture war shitpost style astroturf and I will not be supporting this sort of nonsense with my hard earned dollars

>>716263210
IGN gave it 8 and the review only focused on gameplay and levels

>>716263259

You’re Indian

I genuinely thought “Wuchang” was a funny slur version of “wukong” because wukong was chinese lmao. i had no idea it was the actual name of the game

>>716258303 (OP)
Written by homosexuals as usual.

Opinion: disregarded
Game: bought

>>716263640
Wait till you see the Wutang game

Ayoooo who else is buying the collector's edition! Absolutely based!

>>716262346


The top review claims the game failed to replicate most if not all the things that made Souls special

While actual souls content creators have given a lot of praise for the level design in the game and compared it to the first Dark Souls

>>716262459
Wait, if this is anything like fire force where a stupid clothes fall off whedon gag undermines every serious moment, there might be a point here

>>716263982
>content creators
I too value the opinions of 'people' that provide slop for the lowest common denominators.

>>716264549
no, they are bitching that THEY put the chick in silly cloths and now it clashes with the serious story.

then they put a malicious and hateful tone to this option THEY did.

>>716258303 (OP)
>Part of what's so compelling about FromSoft games is the imaginative ways they blend horror and humor in their worlds
Ok but who the fuck asked about Fromsoft

I'm going to buy 12 copies of this game to own the libs, who else is with me?

>>716258303 (OP)
Games are supposed to be for kids, even the M rated ones are designed to be kid friendly. Nothing kid friendly about a game that outright encourages wifeless old men to goon to it.

>>716258303 (OP)
>you control the buttons that you press
Horseshoe theory is so heckin' valid

>>716265140
hell yeah bro! MAGA

this is the 2nd review I've seen that malds at the fact that the game is a fantasy setting and not a 1:1 historically accurate ming dynasty setting. Obviously it's a strawman argument because they are just mad that main character is attractive and has sexy outfits, but it's such a specific complaint that I've seen repeated now.

>>716258303 (OP)
Chinese Stellar Blade ....

I'm tired of men being afraid of their own dicks

>>716264660
They actually play the games

>>716258303 (OP)
>trannys mad

You love to see it

>>716264730
Yeah they clearly missed the chance to add hip hop music and gay slave fucking the lord wife for more realism

>>716262459
>you can tell a story about the depravity of an invading army, as long as you treat barbaric acts with the required sensitivity
>add female rape mechanic
>not like this
>angry emoji

>XIV and blizdrone at the same time

holy fuck. you have to put in effort to be this fucking gay

>>716258303 (OP)
It's souls slop anyway, irredeemable shit taste game. Wumao.

>>716263259
>Saar, do the needful and buy India developed westoid slop saar, Support Indian outsourced labor saar

>>716258303 (OP)
Why does /v/ think every reviewer can't ever have their personal preferences influence their reviews?

>>716258303 (OP)
i have a 17 year steam badge and i haven't read a single article of theirs

>>716265140
I bought one copy, ain't buying more kek

>>716268818
this is consolecuck falseflagging like most of the thread. PCfags would buy it because the faggot said he didn't like running around in underwear. it's the little things you have to look for, /v/

>>716268818
Reviews are supposed to be objective and politically agnostic...you know, the fucking professional standard? But I guess expecting anything from journos nowadays is foolish, it's okay tho, PC Gamer will be shutting down soon

>>716268818
reviews aren't about sharing opinions, they're about awarding metacritic scores me and all my other discord tranny friends can use to spam social media

>>716258303 (OP)
When reviewers show how hostile they are towards their core customers and how useless they are as a resource, the only thing they accomplish in the long run is destroying their own reputations. Imagine if someone plays this game, has fun, and then goes to PC Gamer and sees that it got a score that ought to be reserved for shovelware because the reviewer is a mentally ill faggot propagandist. He's not going to say-
>Oh, so this is the correct opinion! I hate this game now!
He's going to look at PC Gamer in the future and say-
>Oh, those are the guys that gave Wuchang a 49 because it had tits.
And that's where we are now.

Everyone with a brain said ten years ago that this current era of oblivion for game journalists and western devs was coming. It took much longer than it should have thanks to institutional investors who are having half of the nation's wealth sucked up into their pockets via taxes and regulations that force people to pay them (this is why they appear invincible), but even they can't keep a vessel where the crew keeps punching new holes in the hull afloat forever.

>>716268818
I don't put stock in any review ketchiving over a female wearing underwear and neither should anyone else, you know damn well if it was a buff dude doing it nobody would care

>>716258303 (OP)
Not a bad price. But when do we get the cracked version? I got time ... Need to complete E33 and SH2 first anyway.

>>716260216
i am, cuck

>>716263259
boy that Ubisoft shareholder meeting really didn't go well.

>this low review because the character is a tit monster is bad
>my low review because the character isn't a tit monster is good

>>716258303 (OP)
Mushroom armor doesnt give you immunity to scarlet rot, you stupid journo mongrel, it only boosts your resistance to it

>>716268818
Most of them don't even like videogames and are soulless activists who are here as part of a machine to coerce devs into moving the industry in a direction that most of its customers don't want. That's why they're worse at videogames than the average gamer.

And let's give them the undeserved benefit of the doubt and pretend like they really are an honest publication just trying to point customers in the direction of games that they will enjoy (instead of what Larry Fink wants them to enjoy). If your opinions are out-of-sync with the customers because they're a product of retardation and mental illness, you're useless as a resource and no dev on the planet should feel like he needs to take your opinions into consideration.

>>716258303 (OP)
I can no longer trust anything I hear about a game with an attractive character because seaniggers will pretend its the greatest game ever made and these insufferable faggots will write it off

>>716269962
>this low review because the character is beautiful and charming for the male audience is bad
>my low review because the character is repulsive to cater to screeching Marxists who hate heterosexual men is good

>>716270663
Wise

>>716262459
That's pretty retard.
>case A
>you hate sports and care little about anything related to it, but, for some reason, you make review about it and expect people to take you seriously
>case B
>you love sports but instead of reviewing what really matters you start complaining that women at the stadium were showing too much skin for your taste
Did I forget anything? Maybe the case in which you just blindly panders to what seems popular in your favorite social media?

>>716258303 (OP)
How come his review is the only one to mention that there WILL be a shop?

>>716271349
Because its fake news.

>>716258303 (OP)
>tranny loving faggot who is obsessed with males looking like women hates a game where a woman is pretty
pottery

>>716262459
>creates a female character
>gets a negative score because of it
lmao biggest defenders of women btw

>>716258303 (OP)
Journos gonna journo.

>>716263248
You're implying that other journalists are better than the gaming ones. Wars get started because of gullible people like you.

>>716275072
this is projection from a Dunning–Kruger nigger.

>>716259026
every time

There's a reason why gays are bullied in school.
Fags have gotten too comfortable being open with their dumb opinions.