This looks fire, chat.

>>716331313 (OP)
Now make it so the horse is eight feet tall and bipedal.

woah....daggerfall if he real.....

>>716331313 (OP)
ELI5
why can't a game like this be made?

>>716331670
AIjeets can't make games.

>>716331313 (OP)
The Yellowing has begun

>>716331313 (OP)
make it do combat

>>716331313 (OP)
why does the character always shrink down while he's walking in these videos?

open-world Hexen would be really cool

>>716331901
Are you really asking why objects get bigger as you get close to them? Are you five days old?

>>716331703
@grok is this true?

I don't get these. It's literally Skyrim. You already have this.

>>716332349
That person is black or brown. They can't even do basic arithmetic.

>>716332349
no, retard. i'm asking why the horse is two feet from the ground when he doesn't start out that way.

>>716331313 (OP)
Who is making these?

>>716331313 (OP)
...

>>716331313 (OP)
AI? The hand look super weird

>>716333443
So then you're asking why the horse shrank, not the character.

>>716333507
>Anti-soul gas
>>716331313 (OP)
>Pure soul ludo

>>716333507
doesn't look nearly as sovlful as the OP

>>716335382
>>716333787
>this image created by a machine algorithm is pure human soul!!

brush up your English word meanings rangdesh

>>716333515
Nah this is real

>>716335756
>t. troon "artist" who's scared of being replaced

>>716333507
I hate how you can tell the trees are just JPGs . AI already has that figure out and it has been out for what... couple of years? Daggerfall was made by MULTIPLE engineers with years wasted in college and even they couldnt figure it out

>>716331313 (OP)
Can't wait for the inevitable game that looks nothing like this.

>>716331670
Multiple differently lit sprites for every object on every possible angle and sun position. Basically devs are lazy and would rather use 3D models

>>716331313 (OP)
What do you do in this game?

>>716331670
Cultic

>>716336607
Walk forward for 5 seconds

>>716331313 (OP)
Woah such technology it's, literally just what games from the 1990s looked like very impressive...

>suddenly...for no reason...gen alpha likes pixel art

>>716331670
It can but it will be a railroad game.
Which is fine honestly but people will be crying about not being able to turn around

>>716331313 (OP)
the most annoying thing about AI faggots is these little "trends" that they start. they lobotomize a concept (see ghibli shit as well), they turn it into complete garbage and then they move on to ruin the next thing

>>716335756
>those jpg trees made by a rasterization algorithm are pure human soul!!!
lul, the double standard

>>716337552
This is a neat idea though. Milennials destroyed pixelart with their corpowoke thin-leg mixels. You can achieve a very similar effect using heightmaps and drawing billboards per point instead of vertex, and then just not allowing player viewport rotation and adding some nice sprites for trees and backgrounds

It's unbuildable. It requires far too much talent and work for today's devs.
Requires a 90s type of mentality and team.

>>716333507
Can I just do whatever in this game? And walk for hours without map loading? How many ways are there to soft brick my gameplay by not choosing something right?

>>716331313 (OP)
I wish these devs would use AI just to get inspiration. This kind of a video would inspire the shit out of me to make a game like that.

>>716338301
it's quite the opposite
Keeping that level of pixel art detail for a whole game is unrealistic, the actual inspiration has been there forever, many games like Daggerfall went for that style

What AI can actually add is the production power to put a pre-existing inspiration into practice. But luddites discard the simple possibility of it, for whatever reason.

>>716331406
>bipedal
cringe

Why can't games look like this anymore?

>>716338781
What game is that? Looks like a russian windows xp virus

>>716331670
>ELI5
>why can't a game like this be made?
The clip looks the way it does because everything in the clip has the appearance of a flat sprite viewed from one angle
The perspective IMPLIES that this is a videogame where you can turn and view the scene from another angle, but you can't
If you were to make a game where the player could turn and view things from another angle, they would cease to look like flat sprites being viewed from one angle and the scene would no longer look like this
The art style used for everything in the image is a rough impression which uses very minimal detail to create an impression of the object it wants to represent. The style itself does not follow any rules which would allow for objects to be rotated, since every single frame of rotation would require a new minimal artistic interpretation of the object to be invented from scratch which would not be consistent with the previous frame

The clip is just AI generation. Have you wondered why the people generating these aren't just asking the AI to turn around?

>>716338781
this looks way too masculine for the modern audience

>>716331670
It might be doable if it's actually a mix of 3d models with simple and heavily stylized textures. Lighting and post processing would also need to be limited to a very small color palette.

>>716339934
It doesn't imply that. It clearly looks like a railroaded game
take your long post format to reddit

>>716339889
Majesty Fantasy Kingdom Simulator, you disgusting zoomer.

>>716340503
thanks unc, fr no cap

>>716331313 (OP)
>widescreen 16:9 induced psychosis gen z mind slaves when they see the power of other aspect ratios

>>716331670
It would be very very expensive, you'll get voxel artist from other countries to work make all the assets

>>716340458
Retard, it's in first person and they went to the trouble of having an irrelevant 5 degree "turn" which doesn't change the perspective of anything but implies that you can turn the horse. Anyone imagining a game which looks like this would of course assume the possibility of turning the horse or at least riding forwards for more than 5 seconds so that your perspective of the environment would change in some way. The only reason these clips are enticing in the first place is the implication that you could move around within this world and the question it plants within your mind of what that could look like, because you can't comprehend what it would look like to "turn a camera" in this example which wants you to believe it's a 3D world

You can't imagine what that would be like, because the style used to represent the background only makes sense in 2D

https://youtu.be/Ojv3XJBrXhs?t=64

>>716338151
>And walk for hours without map loading?
Yes
>How many ways are there to soft brick my gameplay by not choosing something right?
Many

>>716341484

>>716331313 (OP)
S0VL, I hope he can reach the castle before nightfall

>>716336192
why didn't right wingers create anything before AI?

>>716333443
Ever consider the horse is mid gallop and of the ground and you have no depth perception?

>>716336582
Not necessarily, there are ways of making 3D models look indistinguishable from sprites except also being able to rotate around and capture lighting. Though I am not sure how that method could be applied to a gigantic scope such as in the OP image.

>>716331313 (OP)
Why doesn't this art style exist in video games? There's got to be something about it that makes it tricky to pull off. Like is it LODs for the billboard trees? Some type of shader used for distant objects so they don't shimmer as their pixels move around?
I'm aware the video is AI, but it's so captivating, and (probably) deceptively simple.

>>716331313 (OP)
>GZDoom
In trash it goes.

>>716331670
Same reason they can't make something that plays like mgs 5

Not worth the effort. Look at the top sellers list in us and uk

good morning sirs i make new game it called ultimate unerworld

>>716343462
I mean it should be doable but it would require a lot of problems solving for every other composition/area.
Production pipeline would be a mess

>>716343462
There's plenty of indie pixelslop.
If you mean 3D environments built with sprites is because on rotation the parallax sprite backgrounds will look fake as hell (not to mention the fact that you should be able to get there eventually), so the best you can do is a filter.

>>716331313 (OP)
>chat
SHUT the FUCK UP. no one cares about this useless ai gimmick shit

>>716331313 (OP)
how's the gameplay?

>>716335382
Same exact gameplay

>>716331313 (OP)
Daggerfall Unity rip off

good morning sirs

>>716341026
reddit

>>716345218
manaregen is godsent

>>716331670
it CAN be made, but these AI jeets can't make anything beyond "wouldn't it be cool if"s

>ummmm how come no game looks like this prerendered ai video

Might as well ask why no games look like the new superman movie or some other dumb shit

>>716331406
The horse is already perfect as it is. You don't require a bucket even.

>>716331313 (OP)
any game that looks exactly like this?

>>716351652
>exactly
None
Making pixel art of that level by hand is possible for an image, but for a whole game? Insane.
Perhaps in a few years with AI

For now you get stuff of much lower detail, like daggerfall and whatnot

>>716351771
>Perhaps in a few years with AI
i just want to immersive myself into it and leave my trash world..

>>716331313 (OP)
that horse is quite small

Like this comment if youre also hoping this shit gets memed into an actual game

>>716340436
well this one definitely look more viable than the others, wonder if anything actually worthwhile will come of this or if it'll just be another worthless ai trend

>>716331313 (OP)
>>716340436
This looks objectively superior to Daggerfall yet luddites will claim it’s inferior because it’s not man made. I can’t wait to enjoy full AI-generated games like this and watch the luddite peasants seethe and cope over it.

>>716353874
you can play daggerfall nigga.

>>716336582
I have a feeling you could achieve a similar effect with tonemapping through a mist pass that will determine how shaded the sprite is.

>>716353874
unless there's some major computational breakthrough your gonna be waiting a very long time anon

>>716340436
You could make an Inifinty Blade knockoff with this style without too much trouble.