It's next, isn't it?

Total sellout death

tick tock nsfw artists, time to get a real job

Didn't they already get hit

>>716342441
they have some gay rules, but still allow nsfw for the most part.

>>716342261 (OP)
already happened more than a decade ago
another case of "i receive money, you receive nothing"

I genuinely despise Patreon's existence more than any other platform on the Internet. Fucking disgusting how many faggots flee to it and then paywall content with NO INTENTION of reuploading it anywhere later down the line. Oh, and if you find a way to get past the paywall, chances are you'll find out they have some SUPER SEKRIT Discord club providing another gay layer for you to trawl through just to find a fucking PNG or MP4. And before you say it's just coom artists, NOPE!! There's a youtuber I watch who has 2/3rds of all his content locked to Patreon, because he's so fucking ashamed of publicly listing his vlogs and reaction videos that he'd rather let them rot away on a "premium" platform.

>>716343209
>And before you say it's just coom artists, NOPE!! There's a youtuber I watch who has 2/3rds of all his content locked to Patreon, because he's so fucking ashamed of publicly listing his vlogs and reaction videos that he'd rather let them rot away on a "premium" platform.
the worst part is you're right, there's many SAFE FOR WORK content creators that locks their content via paywall, even deceased users.

loli, rape and incest was never allowed on Patreon.

>>716342441
patreon has been squeezing harder and harder for years now, yes

doesn't really matter to me. most of the shit on the site at this point is bad AI porn. creators were afraid of people pledging and getting everything retroactively, so most make their rewards only available for a very short window, and then maybe make it available for quadruple the price of one month on some sketchy store later.

>>716343013
it's actually a case of "i receive less money, you receive less money" with no gain. yes it's that retarded and at this point the payment processors should be held liable for acting against shareholder interests

cant say im super thrilled with patreon, but everyone who complains about it is an actual nigger who thinks that the artists should work for free

whores, porn artists, and porn game devs are a big chunk of patreon's users, no?

the amount of artists who have stuck with this cucked fucking platform is unreal. zero tegridy. not even allowed to do hypno... and you know guys like Comandorekin would use real dog dicks and not the same Skyrim werewolf model every time if their wings weren't so clipped by this thing's POS TOS.
honestly Patreon getting nuked tumblr/gumroad style would be based.

You'd think OnlyFans the places like that would have been first in line but I guess selling Lolicon content is worse than selling CP.

>>716346201
>at this point the payment processors should be held liable for acting against shareholder interests

The problem you are facing here is that at the end of the day everyone is still using the payment processors. Think about it, they're at the end of every pipeline. Money doesn't flow from these game sites and such? who gives a fuck, that same money is going to flow from some other source.
Literally the only way to hurt them is if millions, fuck maybe over a billion, people decide to stop buying things online entirely, stop using credit cards entirely, and pay for everything in cash for months.

The other alternative is for some enterprising individuals to start creating their own payment processor or maybe American Express (Amex) steps up to fill this void.

Or there are laws passed/supreme court cases done that state basically that these payment processors can't simply deny business based on the products some other party sells.

One last alternative is that crypto is used exclusively for these sorts of purchases and its successful enough to make these larger payment processors to take notice and want a piece of it again.

all 4 scenarios are very unlikely

>>716342261 (OP)
literally nothing would change if this website got nuked

>>716342261 (OP)
the 'fictional characters have to give consent' bit was fucking hilarious, what a meme of a website

>>716343209
why don't you... just... pay like $5 per month if you care so much?

>>716343209
There's some really random nobodies who put most of their content behind paywalls. One vidia tuber I checked out turned his whole channel into some bottom of the barrel streamer bait slop and all actual series are paywalled.
And the paid discords I cancer. I already reset having to be in discords for everything if you want to know what is going on anywhere you now have to pay for the privilege. And zoomers are absolute moralfag paypigs and will make fun of you for not getting FOMOed into paying for super sikrit channels they hang out in like that was normal and tattle on "leakers".