Anonymous
7/25/2025, 1:33:31 AM No.716360214
I agree Nintendo has gone too far with their antipiracy policies, but I'm trying to understand if consoles are actually getting "bricked" (not fully truly bricked, clearly, if Nintendo posses the killswitch to restore its functionality) and completley inoperable, or if they are just disabling online services for customers like the bans they've done in Switch 1? I know the EULA says they can brick it but I have seen no evidence of actual full kills happening.
My biggest gripe is that it seems journos and youtubers are conflating the two. Even a pseudo brick is not the same as telling you that your games will work but only offline and your online sub was taken back.
Both suck, I don't support Nintendo doing any of this, but we can't just report incorrectly what's happening. It vastly changes the story, makes pro-consumer right movements unreliable and untrustworthy, and gets us nowhere to mislabel.
My biggest gripe is that it seems journos and youtubers are conflating the two. Even a pseudo brick is not the same as telling you that your games will work but only offline and your online sub was taken back.
Both suck, I don't support Nintendo doing any of this, but we can't just report incorrectly what's happening. It vastly changes the story, makes pro-consumer right movements unreliable and untrustworthy, and gets us nowhere to mislabel.
Replies: