I'll bet 90% of so called "gamers" on /v/ can't beat my PC's performance.

>she still plays on PC

>>716492802 (OP)
cool. but what games are you playing on it?

a PS5 smokes those specs lol

>>716492802 (OP)
Your benchmarks are irrelevant to me since I only play games that look like this.

>>716493195
gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

Okay but can it run Star Citizen?

Well no shit /v/ is filled with kids with no jobs these days.
I'm 30+ I learned to not waste so much money on a rig, I'm running a 9600x/4060 right now and its perfect for every game at 1080p

>>716493168
Let's just say it's over 300 times the size of the average PS and Switch 2 library

>>716492802 (OP)
>14th gen intel
Look at him and laugh.

>>716493450
I used to think this but now I'm convinced that 2k is the sweet spot. It also is dependent on how far away you are from your monitor

>>716493490
list the best ones

>>716493575
Explain? It's in the 90th percentile of modern CPU's.

>>716493637
Hello Kitty Island Adventure

>>716493659
You've been living under a rock? Geniuses at Intel hq designed 13th and 14th gen cpus to kill themselves

>>716493602
Nah, you end up upscaling or downscaling every movie ever produced and the extra power needed isn't worth the small definition increase, 1080p and 4k are both great, the middle is just pants on head retarded

>>716493756
it runs on GeForce 650

>>716493829
Source?

>>716493862
>>716493659
lmao imagine trying to troll with the most know issue of this past gen
https://community.intel.com/t5/Mobile-and-Desktop-Processors/July-2024-Update-on-Instability-Reports-on-Intel-Core-13th-and/m-p/1617113

>>716493849
Disagree, 4k is marginally nicer than 1440p while requiring serious amounts of processing power. 1440 is significantly and noticeably more high rez than 1080p while still giving you 100+ FPS at maxed settings in most graphically demanding games, while 50-60 FPS in an insane stress test like Steel Nomad.

>>716493862
Seriously anon, how do you NOT know about the 13th and 14th gen instability issues?

>>716493975
I dunno works on my machine :^)

>>716492802 (OP)
thats rtx4070tisuper with Ryzen 7 7800X3D

>>716494042
>he says as he proceeds to get 15 fps on his 3rd gen i7

>>716493195
1/10 ragebait

>>716494052
For a while, yes, then you have to rma

>>716494116
Impressive, very nice, let's see your screen resolution.

>>716493450
lol 4060 is the same as old 50 seiriesgpu but worse
pc gaming is a scam now

I respect your opinion but 1080p still looks crisp and detailed without needing that much power, hence I have a 4060, per my original post.

>>716494318
Literally what? Consoles struggle to run medium settings at 60fps 2k.

>>716494227
same as yours: 2560x1440 not sure why 3dmark do not want to show that

>>716494318
I've had it for 1.5 years now, runs anything at 1080p high or ultra settings

>>716494390
Fair enough. I gamed on 1080p with an 8gb 1070 for a decade.

>>716494468
Nice looks like You're set with hardware for a while, can 40 series cards run DLSS 4?

>>716492802 (OP)
>I'll bet 90% of so called "gamers" on /v/ can't beat my PC's performance.
You would be right. The majority of this board's PC player are still on shit like GTX1650.

>>716494227
>>716494576
re-run the test and now it shows.
Yyea, I think I am set for a couple of years, and its weird that 5070 is slightly worse

>>716494052
Spoken like a true retard. Bet you didn't even update your microcode yet. Enjoy your degraded CPU.

>>716494915
Meds, now

>>716493984
>4k is marginally nicer than 1440p while requiring serious amounts of processing power. 1440 is significantly and noticeably more high rez than 1080p
This is just mathemathically wrong. 1440p is 3,686,400 pixels,1080p is 2,073,600 pixels, 4k is 8,294,400 pixels.
Which means 1440p is 1.77x of 1080p - but 4k is 2.25x of 1440p or 4x of 1080p. 4k is a substantially bigger upgrade over 1440p than 1440p is over 1080p.

>>716495103
It is but he and I already settled our differences anon, not need to "win" every argument on the internet

>>716494821
>>716494821
Probably because you have an extra 4gb of VRAM

>>716495103
Yes, but can your eye notice the extra resolution?

>>716495307
Yes. I have 4k 27 inch and 1440p 27 inch monitors side by side, even on this panel I notice it especially during motion. Image quality of modern games scales with output resolution more than ever before, because we're in the age of temporalslop.

>>716494979
Bios update, now!

>>716492802 (OP)
See ya at mom's.

>>716492802 (OP)
my 7900xtx gets 73fps

>>716492802 (OP)
Kneel

I might try it later when I can shut down some stuff I currently have running.

>>716496654
Yeah idk wtf OP is happy about, I beat his score on my minmaxed Intel Arc B580 rig.