Do people really like object based Pokemon? Like, what's the charm of them?

magnemite is the perfect pokemon, prove me wrong

Depends which one.

>>716524998 (OP)
It's a tool and a pet rolled into one

>>716524998 (OP)
I don't think they are the most popular, but a few are moderately so... Voltorbs, Magnemites/Magnetons... Litwick maybe?

The games also kind of try to force Rotom, but I dunno if they are popular.

>>716527170
I... I can't..

>>716527170
shit evolution(s)

>>716524998 (OP)
it works for magnemite but it's jarringly shit for some others like the keychain

>>716524998 (OP)
animal magnetism

>>716530052
Christ that is such a shit design. At least with Magnemite you could somewhat imagine that an animal could evolve that way in this fantasy ecology. Whereas that's just a fucking keyring with a face.

See also this Beauty and the Beast-looking fucker. Utter dog shit.

>>716530052
I like klefki
The idea of a key mimicking fairy like Voltorb mimicks pokeballs is cute

>>716530790
seconded
>>716530686
sinistea isn't an objectmon imo
yes obviously it's in a teacup but if living in a non-pokemon object means it's an objectmon that also means dwebble is an objectmon, which it isn't

is Chimecho an objectmon?

>>716531089
no but he is very handsome

Everyone loves Magnemite

I like this one.

>>716524998 (OP)
Its a object but its alive. So its cool

>>716531731
This fucker ruined steel types forever

Name any pokemon past gen 2 that are cooler than these. Protip: you can't.

>>716531843
you're probably right but
cool sword

>>716524998 (OP)
everything after gen 2 is literally garbage