>It's a bad game because:
>Muh difficulty
>Muh challenge
You are the nigger of the video game world.
>It's not a bad game it's just a bad [random series] game
>I just don't like the gamefeel
>can you beat [game] with [self-imposed incovenient limitation]?
Unironically yes. Any game that is too obtuse for me to enjoy is shit. It's a video game, not a doctoral thesis.
if a small percentage of people who buy the game beat it, it is a bad game
>>716528195 (OP)yes, a game can be bad if it's too easy/hard or the difficulty is poorly designed in one way or another
>>716528727I have a feeling most people who say this don't know what it means
>>716528254explain banjo kazooie nuts and bolts without using this line
Frog posters are always /ourguys/. I will always trust them
>>716529048>shitty open world game that's empty as fuck with grindy boring mechanicsNobody would have liked that game if it was its own IP.
>>716528195 (OP)If the biggest feature of a game is being inconviniently hard for hardness sake, then yes, I won't waste my time on it. Why subject myself to hours of torment when I can play a game that respects my time. Challange is good and when done right it can be peak gaming but soul sucking hard games can bin it imo.
>>716529272Picrel is a challanging game that ramps up the difficulty along with your skill and adaptation to new mechanics.
I propose 4chan goes the SA route and just charges 10$ for accounts.
No more third worlders, no more redditfrogs no more redditors
>game is bad because it's "too easy"
>it's actually above average difficulty by a fair amount
>it's also harder than most games that are like it
>but somebody is complaining because their own online perception of the game led them to believe it was harder than it actually was, and now they can garner le internet points by calling it bad for being too easy