>>717197934Ok, I've not used Meta's, try doing the same with Chatgpt, I think you'll have a wildly different experience. I've had luck with Gemini too and use it for language learning where I literally talk to it and it talks back to me real time. I'll give you a use case example with gpt
>Discussing Rousseau and moral relativismIt tried telling me that Rousseau believed in objective morality and I said that was wrong which it conceded, because he uses the term virtue to differentiate between morality (social law) and innate goodness of character (virtue)
>Ok, who are some authors that believe change is inherit and therefore can back up our now shared belief that morals are relative (it fights me on this last bit each time, funny enough it at one point told me morals evolve and I corrected it because the term evolve implies linear growth towards something superior when used in that context and it admitted it was wrong and walked it back)Sure anon, here's a list of shit authors:
>Ok, that list sucks, Plato's a sophist, Aurelius is a bore, the other two are proponents of change and don't see how that's a destabilizing force in society that renders us eternally unhappy to the benefit of our governments/slavers. Give me someone who is opposed to that shitAh ok I understand now, you'll love Edmund Burke because of xyz, you should read Reflections on the French Revolution
>Neat, sounds like de Maistre, could you recommend me to him in a similar line of questioning or are you advised not to as he's considered a fascist by some moronsYes I could recommend Joseph de Maistre, he's a prominent writer and shares much with Burke
And now I have my next book to read, it's been great so far, wonderful recommendation from a machine