Unrealbros...our engine is shit...

>>717429728 (OP)
Why does pajeet_nation just copy what the quote says? Do you have to write more words to get paid on xitter?

>>717430008
monetization on xitter was a mistake. Its just 3rd worlders regurgitating shit for clicks

Petition to ban threads with Pirate Nation screencaps in. This Indian shitskin steals your posts and makes money off them.

>>717429728 (OP)
I mean, it IS possible.
But you'd have to code it, instead of installing from a workshop

>>717430163
Vultures can use "bad" words, such as nigger or faggot. Do your duty and use nigger and faggot as much as you can, so these niggers and faggots can't steal posts

>>717430519
What are you on about? Elon's X allows for those. Free speech, tranny.

>>717431190
>>717430519
>>717430163
Saying kike is GUARANTEED to trigger the social media censorbots so spam that in the posts.

>>717429728 (OP)
>destruction is literally worse now than in bad company 1

>>717429728 (OP)
I thought it was on UE5?

>>717432012
why?

>>717430163
I second this motion this jeet just posts his own twitter posts

>>717432091
Graphics mogged by bf1 and bf5 and battlefront

>>717429728 (OP)
Didn't they have the problem with their last game that pretty much everybody from the original staff had left and nobody knew how to maintain Frostbite anymore

They're not letting non-EA games use Frostbite though.

>>717429728 (OP)
only Dice knows how to destroy things like their franchises

>>717429728 (OP)
But Battlefield's """"destruction"""" is much worse than 5 installments ago. We went from being able to actually level houses and buildings, to only setpiece destruction shit.

>>717430158
that only happens because there's an audience for that garbage, all twitter users should be shot on sight

>>717429728 (OP)
that's complete bullshit though
ue5 game:
https://youtu.be/Y47ijezhZoA

If you're an indie game studio that wants a AAA-level 3D game engine, probably not too many other options out there than Unreal Engine.

>>717429728 (OP)
>DICE lead producer David Sirland saysin Battlefield 6's unique destruction isn't possible on a generic engine like Unreal Engine 5

David said "This kind of destruction, what we're doing, is not achievable on a generic engine". He, or anyone else, didn't mention anything about Unreal Engine 5.

>>717432737
unreal engine physics are laughably bad. its insanely scritped and limited. roblox actually has better physics than unreal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzIKbjuSy2A

>>717432889
I acknowledge your post in fears that no one else will.

>>717432985
You can write your own physics engine, you know that?

>>717429728 (OP)
The only people in EA who know how to use Frostbite are DICE, because they built the fucking thing. Remember how Anthem was forced to use Frostbite from an EA CEO directive to defray costs of Frostbite's development, and how Bioware had no fucking idea how and the engine was poorly documented and all that?

I think another ME game also used it (Andromeda?) and it was a huge thorn in their balls, too. Proprietary engines are a meme and a huge business risk, but they can do pretty cool things. Just as long as the studio building and maintaining the engine is the same one using it.

>>717432316
You can license the Cry Engine and that runs better and looks cleaner than UE5.

>>717433285
Proprietary engines are great as long as 1. your parent company isn't forcing it on other studios and 2. you retain the employees who built it and understand how it works. 343i and their """slipspace engine""" are a laughably bad example of number 2.

Doesn't a game like the Finals have destruction like battlefield?

>>717429728 (OP)
I mean Frostbite was made just for this shit, it's a shit engine for anything else, but works fine for BF.

>>717432985
Wtf this paper came out 3 weeks ago and not every engine is using it yet? Epic hire this man!

>>717429728 (OP)
Doesn't THE FINALS run on Unreal Engine 5 and have far better destruction than anything they showed in BF6?

>>717429728 (OP)
I like the wording, he's not saying Unreal Engine is shitty, explicitly. But he's strongly hinting to the interviewer that it is second rate in the context of what they are trying to accomplish. Excellent way to talk shit. 10/10

>>717429728 (OP)
>Jeet_Nation
>Sarland

ex DICE devs using UE5 made better destruction than the jeets and trannies that are working on BF6, though.

>>717432737
>>717433965
>>717434742
I knew some retards would bring up this game. The Finals uses UE5 but the devs heavily modified every aspect of the engine to run smoother and support the destruction physics they were going for (akin to how Titanfall and apex legends use Source engine but extremely modified). Battlefield devs are right, you can't replicate that shit on vanilla UE5 unless you basically redo the whole engine yourself like what the finals team did.

>>717433667
>proprietary engines are great
Not for anything beyond AA, and for one big reason: You need a full dev team, often as big as a game dev team, to build and maintain a game engine. Epic has hundreds of people working on Unreal, for comparison. If you're a company, and if you're not selling your proprietary engine (which rarely happens), the game it's supporting basically has to sell enough to cover both the gamedev salaries AND the enginedev salaries. With AAA as fucked as it is in terms of costs, it's not a coincidence companies are ditching in-house engines and just paying Epic the 5-10% or whatever license fee for Unreal.

>>717435365
???
UE5 has chaos physics/destruction built in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7OCjqa9-vc

>>717435652
If that's the extent of it in that video then the statement still stands.

>>717435365
>"THING" ISNT POSSIBLE WHEN YOU USE ANY OTHER ENGINE! ITS ONLY FORSTBITE WHO CAN DO IT!
>shows UE5 game that does it
>UHMMM SWEETY YEAH THEY USED UE5 BUT THEY MODDED IT A BIT SO ITS TOTALLY NOT UE5 ANYMORE ITS JUST NOT POSSIBLE WITH UE5 OKAY?????

>>717435168
Well post proof.

>>717430008
people(subhumans) do the exact same shit here, so it can't only be because of money

>>717435732
It's not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3ktiewcLpo

Modern Battlefield destruction is scripted lol.

>>717435823
This was 6 years ago too, mind you

>>717435793
every building is 100% destructable in the finals and you can bring it down completely.
meanwhile bf6 still has tons of walls that cannot be destroyed even a little bit

>>717435168
that looks like shit man

>>717430163
Indians do everything better, sir

>>717429728 (OP)
SAY HI TO THE CAMERA PATEL

>>717435932
lol cope. bf6 has scripted destruction and 70% of the buildings cant be interacted with
all the talent dice had left for embark
https://youtu.be/DgLdbdwdulQ?si=3oXW1VcGxQX9OLrZ&t=599

>>717436495
you type like a paid shill bot

>>717430163
>NOOOOOOOO STOP STEALING MY POSTS THAT I POST FOR FREE ON A PUBLIC WEBSITE AND THEN MAKING MONEY OFF OF THEM YOU HAVE TO BE A DEAD END WAGIE LIKE ME
cope

>>717436571
t. ea shill

>>717436642
>no u
classic brown retort, we're done here

>>717436698
>loses the argument
>w-ww-were done h-here
hahahahahha
go on show me the bf6 destruction as dynamic as this, go on mr EA marketer

>>717432012
>>717432137
this.
why the fuck do we keep going backwards

>>717436495
Max 12 players though. Gay.

>>717429728 (OP)
Bump

>>717437676
top looks better

>>717429728 (OP)
That's bullshit, The Finals can do it just fine