Thread 717462224

>wait, so it's all placebo?
always has been

Resolution is more important for gaming than it is video which is presumably what this data was based on.
Higher the res, the less noticiable aliasing will be meaning you don't need quite as strong of a Vaseline smear across the screen to hide the jaggies.

2x hardware aliasing is all that should have ever been needed

>>717462224 (OP)
>source is another guy's ass

>>717462224 (OP)
>24" 1080p monitor
>AA: off
>render scale: 200%
>all other settings maxed
simple as that

>>717462784
If I'm really looking for it, I can see the increase to 4x AA. Anything past 1080p though just isn't visible unless you sit within a foot of your monitor though.

>>717462598
Just use a down sampler instead of AA if you think it looks like shit.

>>717463174
>same performance cost as running at 2160p but looks worse and no screen estate

Here's the real graph with an actual source

>>717462224 (OP)
Honestly the thing that's made 4k gaming the dumbest to me is actually having it.
Nice for work stuff though.
But if your game doesn't look good in 480 it's shit.
HD is a meme.

>>717463214
1440 is the best current native resolution, + 2x hardware aliasing is the ideal, ridiculous it got this complicated

>>717462224 (OP)
y-axis is viewing distance in FEET
seriously who is gaming more than 15 feet away from their monitor?

>>717463285
>>same performance cost as running at 2160p
2160p is 4x the pixels so that'd be 400%

Resolution determines the maximum solid angle your screen can take from your vision while looking good. Ideally you want a 17280p monitor or greater for VR.

>>717463326
Where's the one using real measurements

>>717463638
I thought the render scale measured only one dimension. Either ways that is the cost of 1440p while looking worse.

>>717463693
Completely fucking mentally ill statement as someone who actual has a VR headset.

>>717463718
Do it yourself with 400 ppd faggot

>>717463837
Every single VR headset looks like absolute shit.

>>717463214
I wouldn't be in any rush to replace a functional 1080p monitor but if I was on the market for one and I had a PC easily able to run most games at 1440p or 4k I'd probably just buy one.

>>717463693
>Resolution determines the maximum solid angle your screen can take from your vision while looking good
Why are you so confidently wrong
Why does this keep happening
Bunch of retards

>>717463326
I sit 2.5 feet from a 27" monitor and the only time I ever notice it's in 4k is while looking at text.

>>717464145
>confidently wrong
Reddit statement.
>asking why this keeps happening
Reddit statement.
>ending it by calling multiple people retards when only one person made the claim in this thread
Reddit statement.

pc monitors usually fall roughly in this box, even this chart says 4k is beneficial for many if not the majority of configurations.

>>717463473
my issue with 1440p is all the videos in games look dogshit because of how they are upscaling them or something
weird pixelation and shit
or my monitor is bad idk

>>717464376
>the majority of people sit 1 foot from a 25 inch screen
retard

>>717463638
100% render scale is 4k internal resolution

>>717464523
He's talking about the size of the monitor retard, OPs graph bloated to account TVs. This is the appropriate one.>>717463326

You are not supposed to stare at pixels from 1 nano meters away

>>717463638
200% render scale is 4k internal resolution

Im a simple man. I have the 1080p screen, and the second 1080p screen. And thats all i need.

>>717462224 (OP)
>Being tall doesn't matter
>Just look at this chart that says people can't properly judge your height from 500 meters away bro

>>717464981
And the graph is showing that even at that monitor size you'd need to sit under 2 feet away from your screen to see it, retard.

>>717462224 (OP)
I don't think you understand what that chart is telling you.
If you have a 25" screen and you're more than 10ft away it doesn't matter how high definition it is, it wouldn't make a noticeable difference.

>>717465846
do you not know how to read a graph?
draw a line vertically from 24" on either chart and tell my at what viewing distance it says 1080p is enough

>>717463581
I game on a 75" home theater system
Apparently I need 16k since I'm sitting 8 feet away according to >>717463326