I am getting tired of these Warriors tie-in games. I liked the first Hyrule Warriors because it was a celebration of the series, not tied to any specific Zelda game. It told a silly, original story and it was fine for what it was.
Then Age of Calamity was a prequel game. Then Three Hopes was an alt-history of Three Houses. Now, Age of Imprisonment is another prequel game, just like Age of Calamity is, only this one is so much worse because this is the story we should have gotten the first time around. If Tears of the Kingdom committed to telling the story of the Imprisoning War, we wouldn't need a prequel game. It's honestly kind of insulting that Tears of the Kingdom had a flimsy, poorly put together "story", just so the actual story can be repackaged into a Warriors spin off.
Warriors spin-offs should be celebrations of the series, none of this fanfiction garbage.
Then Age of Calamity was a prequel game. Then Three Hopes was an alt-history of Three Houses. Now, Age of Imprisonment is another prequel game, just like Age of Calamity is, only this one is so much worse because this is the story we should have gotten the first time around. If Tears of the Kingdom committed to telling the story of the Imprisoning War, we wouldn't need a prequel game. It's honestly kind of insulting that Tears of the Kingdom had a flimsy, poorly put together "story", just so the actual story can be repackaged into a Warriors spin off.
Warriors spin-offs should be celebrations of the series, none of this fanfiction garbage.