did you retards managed to annoy /a/ enough to warrant a prune-on-sight response? do you think /v/irgins are more likely to have child porn embedded? as if this dreadful board doesn't have enough awful generals, just go away
>>720400334
and epic bacon narwhal to you too, my fellow anonymous ;)
consider coming up with better insults, if you have not completely degraded after repeating the same few ToT correction canned responses from twitter >>720400359
thank god for that >>720400658
what fun indeed! i don't even have to bait to get (you)s, since you lot are so indignant
>>720404023 >Retards still don't understand that "The Treachery of Images" admits that even if the image isn't a literal pipe it is still a depiction of a pipe, so by using this argument they are admitting lolis are depictions of children
mods are psychopathic and with a vendetta against fucking lolis >>720404892
why the fuck they keep deleting it? i never seen such a gayfurry obsessed behavior. no where