Thread 723004042

MOBAs need not apply.

What is a man?

>>723004042 (OP)
>Made with Pinata Farms
Really? You're too fucking stupid to put text on a plain blue background? It's not even the right fucking font for Jeopardy.

>>723004042 (OP)
>MOBAs need not apply.
Shots fired.

DOTA 2 moggs any RTS

>>723006006
>>723006114
I can't play the same map over and again, not to mention last hit mindless PvE for 90% of the game. Always having potential PvP is exciting, but even medium skilled opponents can avoid ganks and stuff.

RTS are much more intensity (what MOBA or most other genre has given you the shakes?). Game times are similar, 10-60 minutes. Playstyles are similar, especially with a hero unit. I think the intensity vastly outweighs any reason to play a MOBA.

>>723007240
Learning the dozens and dozens of heroes in a MOBA would be much harder than learning a good RTS, especially if they watched replays after every game . . . perhaps only play one map.

The vastly greater variety:depth is much more rewarding -- that risk:reward.

AoE/SC-style RTS games got a lot worse when you started being able to micro your entire army at the same time like a big hero unit with hivemind pathing AI.
Unintentionally or not, the control limitations and unpredictable pathing AI made for a good simulation of the scale and chaos of warfare. Two blobs playing footsie not so much.

Peak RTS gameplay is 1v1 Starcraft between two people who are competent enough at macro but not tryharding micro.

>>723008274
https://urc.tauniverse.com/tasc.htm.

>>723004437
Zoomers are tech illiterate and don't know how to use a computer. And I don't think there's a phone equivalent of MS Paint.

>>723008015
you wont see 90% of the characters in games with rosters that large.

>>723004042 (OP)
Survival Sandbox

>>723010386
>Singleplayer.
>Better than PvP multiplayer.
LOL. LMAO.

Is Supreme Commander Forged Alliance the only RTS someone should play?

>Zoom-out.
>Attacking while moving.
>That unit meta.
>Techs.
>Commanders and upgrades.
>Large scale battles.
>Experimentals.

same rts thread by the same autist every day. don't you have anything else you're interested in you bored cunt? spam some threads about survivalcraft slop if you love it so much

>>723009114
There's tons of draw apps for phones and adding text is in all of them

www.youtube.com/watch?v=egxzPAywNEs

>>723016152
Is the old RTS worth playing, or should I just play TA?

>>723007240
>RTS are much more intensity
HELLO SAAR I TOO LOVED TO CLICK ON BUILDING AND MAKE UNIT SAAAR!!! SO FUN SO INTENSITY TO CLICK ON THE BUILDING SAAAR!

>>723018307
That's clear and succinct English.

Supreme Commander 3 when?

Why does GPG even have a publisher? Surely they can afford game development, especially with cosmetics or crowdfunding or something.

Is BAR anywhere near as good as SCFA?

>>723007240
What defines variety:depth in an RTS?

>>723022545
In SupCom, it's the sheer amount of units and buildings, mixed with having a commander, which is worth 20 tanks and, like, 2 or 3 engineers when he's not upgraded. I also like having only 2 resources, energy being freely buildable, and mass points, though limited, having infinite extraction.

https://unitdb.faforever.com/

>>723017684
I really like the ARM units in TA.

>>723008274
>AoE/SC-style RTS games got a lot worse when you started being able to micro your entire army at the same time like a big hero unit with hivemind pathing AI.
>Unintentionally or not, the control limitations and unpredictable pathing AI made for a good simulation of the scale and chaos of warfare.
Imagine thinking this.

>>723025156
The Brawler is so good.

>>723008274
No. Fuck you. There is nothing shittier in games than retarded AI not doing what you want, and I do not fucking want a game that is intentionally difficult to control.

>>723029301
The D-Gun is so effective and cool.

>>723013787

>Good music.
>The original 151 Pokemon.
>Damage type rock-paper-scissors.

Somebody red pill me on RTSs.

>>723033131
they fun
pill administered
come again

>>723004437
These RTS threads are more like humiliation rituals honestly. I just come in here to laugh at people.

>>723033292

What RTS do you play, /v/?

>>723034003
I played a lot of RTS a few years ago and didn't really like anything but Supreme Commander.

I haven't paid attention to any new games in the last two years.

How would you all feel about an RTS that gives everyone a steady income?

Does BAR have land, sea, and air?

>>723037685
How practical is this?

>>723037982
Really good. On a map where bases are somewhat far back, Salems can take a walk and just start wrecking. They're really strong.

>>723037982
I really like Cybran navy up to T2. Their destroyers (those Salems) are maybe the strongest dessies, even effective against subs, IIRC.

I usually play Seraphim and rush T3 subs, but I always try to get a Cybran engy and start with their navy. So much pressure against land, which can really help teammates. I hope FAF hasn't nerfed Seraphim T3 subs too much. Somebody let me know on that.

>>723038925
>>723039952
I mean it in a more literal sense. Like, how practical would these be to have on the battlefield?