>>724567776 >"proven wrong"
cameos in other unrelated games isn't a crossover. >"spam"
two threads isn't spam, the first one got deleted because of janny meltie.
>>724568067
So by your logic, Smash Bros isn't a crossover?
What is it? Just a bunch of cameos?
Then my next question is; how do you define a "real crossover"? Be specific please.
Thanks.
>>724568426
I just try to be optimistic about my favorites franchises. Well... least I still have the original trilogies and can just image what it would have been.