>>724734636
People always say this shit, but Halo 4 is the Halo game that explains it's own narrative elements the most
CE doesn't explain shit (but also barely has a plot so it's fine), Halo 2 just expects you to pick up who characters are and what's going on as you go, Halo 3 outright has shit from the novels in it, as does Reach, etc. Not that any of that is a problem, but it's not as if they all go out of their way to explain stuff or are devoid of links to the novels
Meanwhile, 4 has the Didact outright lay out what his plans are, has the librarian give a giant exposition dump, and has the terminals to further explain shit on top of that. 4's writing is bad, but the problem is not it relying on the books to explain shit.
>>724736289
Most of them range from decent to pretty good, some are outright excellent.
People will tell you 343i's novels suck and to only read Bungie's, but 343i has put out like 4x the amount of books then Bungie did and honestly of the ones I have read, 343i has the higher average quality, though also more stinkers
>>724736851
The Flood is pretty meh, but still worth reading
>>724743325
Halo 2 exponentially expands on the worldbuilding
>>724746128
Halo 5 was actually an intentional attempt to undo the CoDification Halo 4 did, by going back to even starts, on map pickups, and iterating/evolving the series with new core movement mechanics instead of loadout shit, GDC talks outright mention this. But people still flipped out because Movement stuff also happened to be trendy at the time and the Halo fanbase is stuck in 2007 when there was a rivarly with CoD and see the series do anything that other shooters are doing as "giving into trends".
Infinite was even more of an overt attempt to return to Classic Halo design, and appealing to 3babies specifically with equipment.
If you try to make a Halo game even more Classic Halo then Infinite is, you'll just make Halo 3: 2.