Thread 724929682

What went wrong?

idk battlefield hasn't been good since bad company 2

>>724930073
Battlefield hasn't been good since 2, zoomer

>>724930162
2 was essentially a downgrade to 1942. The addition of a "commander" wad such a r*ddit idea

>>724930162
i enjoyed 2142 more

>>724930162
BF2 is just shit version of 1942

>>724929682 (OP)
>Hardline has 3 maps only
Wot?

>>724930073
Wrong.
Battlefield 5 and Battlefield 1 were both good, and still have active playerbases.

>>724930725
weak argument

>>724929682 (OP)
It wasn't made by the people who made the good ones.
They didn't try to make a great instalment in the series, they just tried to make it good enough to be moderately successful in the first year of release. It's an industry problem. /thread

>>724931823
People will talk about 'what needs fixing' when the game has been in full content drip live service mode for months, and the list of things will be limited to things that we had over a decade ago. I'm not playing this shit because why would I

>battlefield hasn't been good since battlefield x, <generic insult>
every BF thread has the exact same posts

>>724929682 (OP)
What I hate about BF6's maps is how symmetrical they all are. Every single map is essentially mirrored with the HQ's and objective locations. It makes for a very linear and samey feel every time you play them. This isn't exclusively a BF6 problem though, you can look at that image and see plenty of maps from other games that are "symmetrical", but it's the fact that it's EVERY SINGLE MAP in 6. Really hope we see some more uniquely designed maps in future updates, but considering the leaked map list from several months ago has been 100% accurate so far it isn't looking too hot.

>>724932059
I agree, but tbf all maps are gonna feel off when the gunplay and movement has been downgraded

>>724929682 (OP)
Battlefield 6 is a CoD game, not a Battlefield game.

>>724930316
Genuinely kill yourself, you retarded subhuman.