>>725448218
>the AI cannot strive to be a master way a human can.
It's already better in 99% of the cases. And a thousand times faster.
Once we get nuclear plant arrays dedicated purely to powering. There's only so much a human can improve upon. AI can improve infinitely. Soon we'll have fully AI-generated games and films.
Then we'll have fully AI-generated metaverses that are tailored for our own individual preferences, streamed directly into our brain.
Stop being a luddite and accept the future. You're like a banana carrier from the 19th century who protested against using machinery to transport bananas from ships to trucks.
>>725448416
How pathetic.