Thread 1984600

EVE Vanguard is a FPS that just had a pre alpha test with access to players of the studio's other game, the MMO EVE online. I tried it and it has incredible potential. The initial tests seems to be a series of extraction shooter maps and a game mode with a 9v9 objective based PVP map. It reminds me of Destiny but with Escape from Tarkov gameplay and also setting up for a battlefield like lobby shooter.

This game is going to be HUGE when it releases. Its a one stop shop for multiple different types of FPS games. It's visually stunning and different enough from other IPs that it feels new. At least for me I bounce from lobby shooters like Hell let loose and arma reforger to Tarkov and Halo. I feel like this could make it so I can stay in one game for the different types of games.

The best part, however is that the game effects things in EVE Online. Which is perfect because it means a guaranteed baseline of players to populate it AND those players are MMO players so they'll likely suck at the game. Literally guaranteed noobs, the game is going to be so fun.

It's still early in development it seems but keep an eye out. I only knew about this because a friend plays EVE but I'm telling you this will be popular.

Adding some images so you can see whats out in the alpha

>>1984622
This is what your clone currently looks like

>>1984600 (OP)
>This game is going to be HUGE
Good joke
t. evefag

>>1984652
Dude all they have to do is make it like planetside and they'll print money.

>>1984600 (OP)
Same shit as dust 514.

>>1984600 (OP)
Didn't EVE already have a laughably bad and mismanaged FPS tie-in? Aren't they just trying the same thing again?

>>1984600 (OP)
>extraction shooter maps
I'm so sick of this fucking genre lol
>9v9 objective based PVP map
I guess. I miss when we used to get medium scale shooters, like anywhere from 12v12 to 18v18.

>>1985013
No it was pretty goof but doomed from the start because sony got them to make it a PS3 exclusive months before the ps4 release.

>>1985030
Same im tired of them. I do think they will scale up the pvp to at least 15v15. Although I am hoping for a persistent planetside type gamemode.

>>1985124
The best thing to come out of it was the months of panic from fat fucks believing you would need teenage shooterfags to secure your moon goo and income stream.

Just like in real life war

>>1984600 (OP)
>fad genre that's already long past its prime
>tie-in with a crusty spreadsheet simulator that no one under 40 cares about
>going to be huge!!!
Buy an ad.

>>1984600 (OP)
>extraction slop
This shit is even worse than dust 514 from a decade ago.
At least the previous game had base raiding with multiple vehicles and defensive turrets.
Also linkage orbital bombing from the other game

I bet it will be a massive success, just like previous CCPnigger FPSes.

>>1984668
Persistent Eve-skinned Foxhole would have been amazing.

have they learned new players don't want weeks of cbt to get certs to stop being stomped? the ps3 thing is a cope, dust failed because it lost 99% of new players after a couple matches

>>1985005
DUST was fun though. I remember plugging a mouse and keyboard into my PS3 to play it.

>>1985751
It would have been hilarious. Fuck CCP for making it exclusive

>>1988166
You're an overweight EVE bittervet who should stop being such a cunt.

>>1990120
>PS3 is unpopular console
>PS4 about to release so noone will buy PS3
>your garuranteed playerbase is on PC
Yes totally a cope, definitely not because people weren't willing to pay 350 dollars for a pos end of life console.

>mmorpg adjacent fps
>9v9 extraction shooter

It's like past a certain budget developers are deathly allergic to doing anything even slightly daring, holy fuck just copy planetside

>extraction slop
>huge
LMAO

>>1988166
>Buy an ad
this is the mark of a retard. the post was the ad.

>>1984600 (OP)
>The initial tests seems to be a series of extraction shooter maps and a game mode with a 9v9 objective based PVP map
>Its a one stop shop for multiple different types of FPS games
>the game effects things in EVE Online
none of this is good. this shit is going to flop. the other posters talking about an EVE skinned Planetside or Foxhole are correct. that's what MMO shitters want.

>extraction
would be fine if they went all-in on it.
>battlegrounds
they're not going to have the scale of Battlefield or the player customized maps of Counter-Strike for this to be successful.
>one stop shop
this is the mindset of somebody developing games 30 years ago. they're out of touch and need to retire if they can't adapt. specialization, and making your game good at that one thing, is how you get success today.
>game effects things in EVE
just, stop. unless this is going to be a minigame within EVE, where you fly around and have a chance to land and enter FPS mode, so you would be competing with Star Citizen. but I doubt EVE players are interested in this. you can't spreadsheet your aim.

they're making a game for an audience that doesn't exist.

>>2008092
Wtf are you talking about, the cross pollination with EVE is the only good thing about the game. They need to have that in game, the only thing is it needs to not be neccesary for either game.

>>2010131
so you think an audience of mutiboxing, RMTing, idle task gamers that spend more time micromanaging their spreadsheets than playing video games, is interested in an fps?

>>2010225
I think they're obsessed enough with EVE that they will play it for the benefits in EVE. Which makes the game have a baseline playerbase of noobs that makes a FPS more appealing for FPS gamers.

>>1984600 (OP)
>Dust 514

>>1984600 (OP)
>Dust 514
>Project Legion
>Project Nova
>Vanguard
Is this one the good one, marketer-kun?

> CCP is one of the most balless game companies ever. They are constantly fearing whales from their one successful game and will never make something they don't like. Whales do not want to play FPS and will not like any really influential links to EVE.
So no main gimmick.
> CCP have a big and pretty funny backlog of attempts to make FPS with links to EVE and they were all shit, and the decisions that led CCP to make them were even shittier.
It is attempt #66, and nothing has changed.
> The previous playtest was abysmally bad, the most common complaint was "what even is that game, where the fucking fun part?". Also, shooting was bad, crafting was bad, and everything they tested was bad.
It is an extraction shooter in 2025 with lame everything.

It will not be big. It will die before being born. Fuck your shilling.

>>2012720
>baseline playerbase of noobs
EO playerbase is declining. There might be some initial rush fueled by EO item giveaways but that won't last, especially as EO players are 40+ yo boomers with zero interest in an FPS. The FPS market is oversaturated anyways with many recent games (with much better dev teams, hype and overall potential) spectacularly flopping. I don't understand how somebody with millions of shekels authorized developing this.

>>2005503
>fuck just copy planetside
They should release an EO-skinned Foxhole with EO's Planetary interaction replaced by Foxhole-style facilities on planets and the ability to lauch orbital assaults (or bombardments) to steal their produce and/or destroy them. Now that would be something.

>>1984600 (OP)
>Eve
>Extraction
>Huge

>>2014683
Dust was the good one, they fucked it by making it a ps3 exclusive
>>2016346
Do you not understand the null blocks and FW groups?
>>2015175
Its not an extraction shooter. Its an fps rpg, extractions are a single game mode.

it wont. fps games on pc are plagued by easy to install cheats.

>>2016632
Yes the genre is kill

>>2016536
Its not an extraction shooter, that was just the demo