>>57934437That's on them for not noticing it gone in SM. That's why I said if they really didn't want to do NatDex proper, they should have just done what they did in SM. Instead they let the genie out of the bottle to grand their wish and now we'll never see NatDex again because they don't have the expectations to include it
Pokemon that are gigafuck popular like Pikachu, Gardevoir and Lucario will now be in every game while it's a coin flip if they feel like adding unpopular shitmons. Again, if adding 100 new mons every 3 years was unsustainable, the either should have started cutting back on new mons entirely or started delaying games for longer than just a 3 year cycle per generation. This new system more negatively affects newer mons than older ones, because now newer ones need to instantly be popular out the gate to become mainstays otherwise they're tossed aside into the fucking trash like the half-assed content they are
But yeah, my point is if you didn't see this happening when the franchise's 20th anniversary games didn't feature a way to legitimately record and own every Pokemon without transfer, I don't know what to say