>>57978134 (OP)
All gay

they have abilities that double attack
this one's so obvious that it becomes a non-question

>>57978134 (OP)
The ability that boosts the attack?

All three have an ability that doubles their Attack stat (Diggersby and Azumarill have Huge Power while Medicham has Pure Power).

>>57978258
it's not obvious if you're not autistic

>>57978296
Where do you think we are?

>>57978296
>You don't know if you don't know
Brilliant

First is a literal shit eater; second one just looks like he shit his pants, and the third one is just a shitty Pokémon.

>>57978134 (OP)
They're all rabbits

>>57978296
nah bro if you can't remember basic shit like that you're genuinely just low IQ
unless you haven't played the games at all, then you're autistic for even coming here

>>57978134 (OP)
They all have spots somewhere on their design.

>>57978134 (OP)
Why is Pure Power still limited to the Medicham line?

>>57978930
>"nah"
>"bro"
>"you are low IQ" instead of "you have a low IQ"
>judging others' intelligence
also no, knowing what ability each pokémon has is not "basic shit". most people have only memorized their favorites' (unless you play comp, but who the fuck does that?)

>>57978991
It's an inherently busted ability that when given to a usable Pokemon (Mega Mawile) runs risk of creating a new god tier mon. If you're asking why it has Pure Power and not Huge Power, something about the JP name for Huge Power is rabbit related but I don't know what.

>>57978991
it's called "yoga power" in japan. should be obvious why they don't give that one out to random mons.

>>57978930
>basic shit
There are over a thousand Pokemon. Why would it ever be considered basic foundational knowledge to be familiar with the abilities of every single one? None of the Pokemon in OP's post are massively popular or iconic, and many people will have rarely (if ever) used them in a playthrough. Why would anyone who isn't well-versed in the minutiae of Pokemon battling remember all three of those Pokemon's abilities?

>>57979006
>>57979030
most people above the age of 18 that have played more than a couple Pokémon games are familiar with names, abilities and types of most mons. You don't have to be a fucking genius to find out what the 3 in the OP image have in common, unless you're the most casual of casual.

They all have Huge Power

>>57979320
>names
>types
yes
>abilities
not even close, especially since abilities didn't even exist for a while. stop seething just because you realized how autistic you are.

>>57979006
lol
cherrypicking grammar doesn't make you intelligent and you thinking it does is just more evidence of your abysmally low IQ, as if you inability to remember basic shit wasn't evidence enough.

>>57979030
The only mon there that isn't popular is diggersby.
You don't play the games and are only here because you are a pedophile looking for children to groom. Get cancer and die you pedo scum.

>>57979006
most autistic post i've ever read

>>57979027
Should have given it to mega lopunny. It's the only other pokemon I think more or less fits the yoga theme

>>57978134 (OP)
they have little spots on them

>>57979320
>>57979405
I've played Pokemon for over 25 years and own a complete living dex. I have never used Medicham in my life, I haven't used Azumarill for over a decade, and I forget Diggersby exists as soon as it goes off-screen. However, I have never once in my life played Pokemon competitively, and haven't battled with anyone since the days of the Game Link Cable. I don't know any BSTs off by heart, I don't know what some moves actually do because I've never used them, and the only ability I ever think about is Levitate, because I know I can't just mash A for Earthquake when those Pokemon appear. I don't need to be familiar with most of the abilities because they're completely irrelevant when you're just stomping through the campaign with your starter. Pokemon is the best-selling media franchise in history, and there are millions and millions of Pokemon fans. It is hilariously out of touch to assume that all or even most of them play the games in the same way that you do.

>>57979534
>all
never said that
>most
yeah, the majority of people who've played the games beyond a few gens and who have actually payed attention while playing are probably familiar with at least one ability the majority of Pokémon have

>>57979603
Sure, most people who've played a few games know some of the abilities, especially the more common abilities. That doesn't mean that everyone's first thought on seeing Azumarill will be "Azumarill has Huge Power which acts as a 2x modifier to its Attack stat".

>>57979621
Im not even a comfag, but I have caught marill at least once in my life and also have the ability to read and retain information.

>>57979645
I've caught thousands of Pokemon in my life and don't have any motivation to remember what all of them do. Until this conversation, I haven't had any reason to think about the Marill line at all since the last time I ticked it off in a regional dex.

Okay, so you're a hyper casual who doesn't really read or pay attention or pay attention to anything beyond the most basic functions while playing the game. Why am I to believe that most above the age of 10 with a functioning attention span plays the same way that you do?

>>57979667
I'm a collector. I don't have any interest in battling, so I don't bother to remember details that are only relevant in battles. Why do you believe that your way of playing and your level of memorising details is more grown-up, common, or relevant than mine?

>>57979678
Because hyper casuals who gloss over every detail of the game isn't representative of the majoirity of people who play these games.

>>57979678
You're a pretty bad collector if you don't know anything about what you collect

>>57978849
>the third one is just a shitty Pokémon
You don't play the games.

What's the point of the "doubles Attack" ability?

>>57981817
It doubles Attack.

>>57979446
but mega lopunny is a rabbit so it gets huge power

>>57981849
or it would if it had one of the two, sorry i worded that in the most retarded way possible

>>57980424
Anon...

>>57980429
When did the catchphrase change from "Gotta catch 'em all" to "Gotta autistically memorize their abilities"?

>>57978134 (OP)
the real answer is that they all have the letter i in their names

>>57978134 (OP)
They have spots on them?

>>57981908
Are you just autistically collecting things cause a slogan told you to? What's the fucking point if you don't even know the things you're collecting?
Imagine if someone collected coins from different currencies but had no idea where the coins come from. That's retarded, like who are you trying to impress??

>>57981920
I play Pokemon for the collecting aspect. I enjoy the dopamine releases from filling up the dex gradually and take pride in a well-organized collection. I don't care if a Pokemon is weak or strong, because I'm never going to get 99% of them out of Home ever again. I don't make sure my Pokemon have Smogon meta movesets on them, I don't care what their IVs are, and I don't max out their levels, because none of that is relevant to me. When someone collects coins, the most precious coin isn't generally going to be the one with the highest face value, because those coins are never going to be spent.

>>57978134 (OP)
I hate how since Gen III they made Azumarill's shtick based around its supposed ridiculous physical strength, even though there's absolutely nothing in lore that implies that. It wasn't a thing in Gen II at all and in later gens it's just pure technicality with no reflection in its Pokedex entries or other lore.

One of the most idiotic Pokemon design decisions ever made.

>>57981960
But the abilities are also not about worth. It's just knowing what the fuck each Pokémon even is. You just like seeing number go up, you don't actually like Pokémon.

>>57982721
I started playing Pokemon before abilities even existed. They aren't fundamental parts of a Pokemon's identity, to me. One of my favourite Pokemon is Lapras, and I haven't used it in a playthrough for years and years. I have no idea what ability it has. You could give it any ability you liked, it would still be Lapras and I'd still like it - I liked it before it had an ability at all because it looks evocative and aesthetically pleasing. Why is it so hard for you to understand that not everyone shares your ideas of what is and isn't important?

>retard meltdown
It was obvious btw

>>57981820
Yeah but why not just give them higher base stats?