If GF can make games like this, why does Pokemon look like shit?

>>57989106 (OP)
because game freak doesn't respect Pokemon's audience

>>57989106 (OP)
Looks like every single soulslike ever

OP samefagging once again in his own thread

>>57989117
Wow, that makes me want to eat diarrhea

>>57989130

/vp/edophiles pretending pokemon games didn't always looked like shit and that they always had standards will never be not funny to me
you never complained back then you have no right to complain now

>>57989145
They explicitly cut the national dex to improve the graphics

>>57989137
>No argument
>Racism out of nowhere
Struck a nerve huh?

>>57989147
>He believed in blatant lies
Retard

>>57989145
The older games made up for it with art direction

>>57989158
lol
lmao even

>>57989152
I mean, it's true. That was the official excuse and it's why the visuals are subject to so much scrutiny that didn't exist when all Pokemon were available. That and they're charging $70 a pop, probably $80 next gen

>>57989170
>That was the official excuse
And you believed it? no wonder you're a 4channer

>>57989149
>out of nowhere

>>57989177
Correct glad you agreed

>>57989106 (OP)
Because you'll buy it anyway.
/thread

>>57989173
>And you believed it?
Of course not, the games look awful

>>57989184
I'm just calling a spade a spade

>>57989106 (OP)
Because the Switch was shit. Dont know if you retards remember, but Ishihara was one of the original doomposters of the Switch, and didn't think it would succeed. The shit is weaker than your fucking smartphone. Just look at the SV beta and its changelogs. Game looks completely different and actually like it was made modern day. Did the immediate jump to 4K60FPS for both SV and Z-A on Switch 2 not immediately signal to you that they were simply being held back by shitty technology?

>>57989237
There are Switch games that look good. Do you only play Pokemon?

>>57989237
>boot up SV on s2
>looks nicer, but game still sucks on its own

>>57989237
Nah Xenoblade 1 DE and Xenoblade X are proof that you can make good looking stuff on the switch. They just can't be bothered.

>>57989331
More
>Open up SV on S2
>Still looks like shit, but at least at a good framerate and resolution
>And the game still sucks on its own

>another day
>another bunch of manchilkd fuckers still can't understand the purview of the series
It's kinda telling the only outright "E for Everyone" games have shitty, low-effort graphics while only Nintendo Game Freak and TPC bother TRYING to make 3D kids' games. I understand to 20-somethings, the gwaffix r bad, but they ignore the tyarget market is some 1e34+ years younger than them, so it's fully "Old men yell at clouds" territory.

>>57989106 (OP)
because pokemon is not on UE5

>>57989607
kill yourself already boomerfag. you will NEVER be paid by tpc, no matter how hard you shill.