>>11804571Learn to read and think, pajeet. Selling games to non-gamers is cold sales as that is considered a cold market. The NES did not cannibalize another consoleโs market as there was no other console to devour, and also had to deal with the resistance of retailers and investors back when Nintendo released in America. Japan also did not have the Atari 2600 before the NES, so the NES was to Japan as the Atari 2600 was to America.
>>11804609It wasn't popular "relatively speaking"/compared to other games, nor a sensation akin to the original when it came out. I don't know how this is hard to comprehend.
>>11804772Wikipedia is a user edited site and thus not an entirely reliable source. It is also often the cause when someone wants to fix misinformation and the original editor keeps reverting their changes no matter what.
Did you know the WiiU also sold really well at launch? Guess that means it was a success, huh?
>>11804759Nintendo and the game industry will also tell you Super Mario 64 was a success despite performing considerably worse than the mainline games before it.
>>11805008It's more like this board is now filled by disingenuous revisionism either by zoomers that really weren't there or zealot console warriors. People will meme you about Sega being retarded with the Saturn and the Dreamcast without acknowledging that the N64 and GameCube were Nintendo's equivalents to these flops, just with more sold units.