>>11812268Good question — and honestly, a very important one these days.
Here’s what to look for when spotting AI-generated trash (whether text, images, or video):
1. Overuse of Vague Praise or Phrases
AI content often leans on filler like:
“of all time”
“widely regarded”
“arguably one of the best”
...without saying why or giving meaningful support. It feels like it's trying to sound grand without substance.
2. Repetition
AI can get stuck rephrasing the same point multiple ways:
"It's the greatest racing game of all time. Truly, the best racing game in gaming history."
Humans rarely write like that unless they’re being ironic or sarcastic.
3. Weirdly Balanced or Non-Committal Opinions
AI loves to hedge its bets:
“This game is both beloved and criticized, depending on the player.”
No strong stance, just trying to please every viewpoint.
4. Excessively Formal or Stiff Tone
AI will often sound unnaturally clean, structured, or polite — unless specifically prompted to be casual or sarcastic.
5. Lists, Everywhere
AI loves lists and bullet points (like this!) because it breaks complex topics into safe, digestible chunks. Great for clarity... but sometimes lifeless.
6. Overly Safe or Censored Takes
AI avoids certain controversial words or phrases even where a human might go there for humor, edge, or spice — unless specifically pushed.
7. Generic or Stock Phrasing
Phrases like:
"a timeless classic,"
"beloved by fans worldwide,"
"pushing the boundaries of gaming"
...should set off alarms.
8. Lack of Personal or Specific Experience
AI can rarely say:
"I played this on my cousin’s crusty Genesis in ‘94 and the D-pad barely worked."
Humans throw in weird details or context. AI rarely does without being forced.
If it feels like a Wikipedia page mixed with a product pitch? Probably AI trash.
Want to test something specific for "AI stink"? Send it my way — I’ll break it down.