This console is very overrated. It has a very limited library.

What were they thinking?

>>11851902 (OP)
>What were they thinking?
"They'll buy everything we do and remain obsessed for decades to come"

This console is bretty gud. It has fun games.

What the heck?

>>11851906
It does have some unironically great games though. It just doesn't have enough games period.

>>11851910
I can't argue with that, but I think it matters less now. It mattered a lot when I only had an N64 and no games...

>>11851906
>It has fun games.
mario, zelda and the list goes on.....

>>11851902 (OP)

>>11851902 (OP)
>What were they thinking?
They literally didn't. Releasing a console with no CD and worse memory bandwidth than a PS1 in fucking 1996 was wild. It's literally among the dumbest consoles ever devised. Only beaten by Saturn's utter nightmare of a slop, but at least Sega understood that memory bandwidth and cheap storage format are important.

>>11851906
Fun games doesn't equal good hardware. OoT's, GoldenEye's, and Perfect Dark's framerate was absolutely kneecapped by N64's piss poor memory bandwidth and zero memory parallelization. The graphics was also worse than it should've been thanks to that.

>>11852167
I said nothing regarding its technical specifications