>>11864841The market was probably too early but I wonder if Sega in 1988 released a system 16 console for $600 and just said yep, its expensive deal with it or buy something else. Would news pundids be outraged at something seen as so excessive for a toy, would people just make fun it, how much cope would be that its just the same as the nes or maybe people would go cool and try to save up for one, would they try to cancel it like with Dungeons and Dragons, would comedians use it as a bit.
Maybe use floppies so the games don't cost $150.
>>11864348 (OP)There has to be a very tiny number of people who knew of it back in the day, even something like Sega Mega CD was considering something for rich people that I only ever saw in store once.
I often wonder what reaction people who owned this or a Sega CD had when they found out the ps1 was coming out, I'm sure some of them dumped it at a big loss as soon as possible. Sure now its retroactively cool but no one expected video games to increase in value, then in 1998 you can play them all for free on pc. I've even had people in 2015 say I was talking BS when I said stuff like NES is worth a lot.
>>11864542If the consolized MVS is in the same looking shell I wouldn't care. If they were the same price I'd probably just get one of the MVS in the repro shell and the nice video connectors. An AES has a kind of cheap feeling shell anyway and the carts rattle around and flex. I mainly got my AES because it was easier to connect to a tv.