Are these worth playing?

>>11875842 (OP)
I only played the first one. It was passable. Definitely not as good as Capcom's Disney games on NES.

They're not groundbreaking by any mean but fun playthroughs.

You may also want to play Bonkers, by Capcom and it's in the same vein

>>11875948
I really don't think these are good images to spam. Maybe if they were 2x4, to better look at on a widescreen monitor

>>11875842 (OP)
All Disney games by Capcom are worth.

>>11875948
kino

>>11875842 (OP)
Yes. Go play them now. Quit looking at this thread and just go.

>>11875948
This game is garbage.

Absolutely. It's early 90s Capcom.
The first one is the most challenging one (not super hard but enough for it to be a fun romp), while 2 and 3 are easier, but great co-op games as well.
Fantastic games, from a distant era Disney comisioned video games to one of the best game developers in the world at the time.

>>11876316
>1-UP requires so much skill to reach that if you can do it, you basically don't need it

reminds me something

>>11876316
What are some other MickeyvaniaMan X scotformers?

>>11875936
Nobody ever talks about the Sega version of this. How is it?

>>11876493
It's basically the same game but with worse graphical effects, worse sound, and a section (the rotating mode 7 thing) replaced by something else

>>11876493
For me it's World of Illusion starring Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck

>>11876493
There's a pretty good comparison here: https://retro-sanctuary.com/mobile/Comparison-great-circus-mystery-mob.html
>>11878530
Same, it was one of the first games I remember playing both single-player modes and two-player back in the day because I wanted to see everything (the game locks certain content and level segments behind Mickey, Donald or Mickey & Donald for those who don't know). The other day, I had the shipwreck theme stuck in my head while I was cleaning out a spooky attic.