>>11879072that's a generous caricature you're painting. It's trivial now to say that Sony and MS made the standard and Nintendo just does weird shit to lock down their hardware...only after Sony not only took the SFC controller for their pad, but then also set up joysticks only after seeing how Nintendo did it and then taking only what worked. Like saying that Tekken 3 was innovative and Sega just pissed around with VF3, when all it actually did was take the things that worked from VF3 and left behind the things that didn't pan out as well. But yes, clearly Sega should have made the most groundbreaking arcade game of 1996 as if it were 2016 and they had a time machine. How awful for companies to try something different when there are no standards. Almost as awful as actually designing games around the hardware they're on, which news flash, every developer does on every system. The current standardized environment exists only because of years of boiling down, as well as difficulties now faced by developers trying to make money in an industry with increasingly thin margins. You can't afford to not be standardized now, but in 2000s and especially in the 90s? Not unheard of to say What Standard?
If you want to talk about dick standards for Nintendo, talk shit about their constant fuckhead game media choices. Carts on 64 is a much better mistake to point out than the controller, at least CD was patently obvious as a major factor in upcoming hardware.