>>11888382Rather then their own board I think they'll just never be allowed on an arbitrary basis.
I thought allowing 6th gen was dubious when it was done since popular 6th gen games still got regular /v/ threads at the time, but it would make sense to have some non-arbitrary consistent rules based on years passed even if they pissed people off a bit.
IMO it would be reasonable to now allow only the first year or two of games for 7th gen consoles because they were stylistically much like games from the 6th gen and older and like PC games that are allowed.
I am curious whether allowing 7th gen would immediately ruin the board or if it would start discussion of niche 7th gen games that doesn't happen on /v/.
If it happened there would need to be a specific rule against discussing last-gen ports of games made primarily for the subsequent gen of consoles. This should already be a rule with the gens we have but isn't for some reason. Most posts are in good faith so I guess it doesn't matter that much.
What if we binned everything generation-based and just said games 20 years or older were allowed? Would that work?