>>3819106He already did below
>>3819105>It has less RPG gameplay than even the most basic DQ clone SNES JRPGs. I said GAMEPLAY, not different ways you can make numbers go up or down
>There is almost non-existent exploration in Undertale and very little exploration in DeltaruneNothing wrong with having your game linear. Better than spending hours mindlessly running around trying to figure out how to progress.
And besides, chapter 4 requires you to do some exploration to fight the secret boss
>character growth is explicitly an illusion, there's no resource management or tactical aspect to speak of. Not gameplay
>There's more warioware/bullet hell gameplay that takes place in a screen stylized as an RPG battle screen, sure.Yeah, that's gameplay
>Name 5 consequential choices from Undertale that aren't just whether you want to play pacifist or genocideNuetral route is a thing, dumbass. It has multiple endings, but here are the five things
1. Killing Papyrus will have Sans disappear rest of the game until the judgment hall
2. Aborting genocide route at Hotland will get you an exclusive nuetral ending
3. Killing everyone but Papyrus will have him be elected as the ruler
4. Killing everyone in a nuetral route will get you the leaderless ending
5. If you kill Flowey in the first nuetral route, he won't show up in the next playthrough to kill Asgore
>inb4 it's not consequentialIt's consequential enough to change the endings you get from your playthrough.
>I wouldn't say that seeing what lines Sans has to say for everyone you kill in neutral really counts as a "choice" that qualifies Undertale as an "RPG" either.Take it to jannies if you want argue if something is RPG or not. It seems they agree that Undertale is one
>>3819107>No and being disingenuous makes you lose all credibility due to severe bias.How am I disingenuous?
>The point was the games aren't anything special. And why does that matter?