>>101117854>That wouldn't make it inflammatory, at allOh it certainly would. NijiEN talents have said it's wrong to assume a child's gender, for example. That sounds pretty unpopular to me, and like something a professional organization should not be representing their brand with.
ANY sort of political statement, from any side, should not be permitted. They should completely stay away from those issues and focus on being an entertainment company. Otherwise they have 0 chance of ever going mainstream. Again, imagine if Nintendo started mouthing far-left, or far-right slogans in their commercials. They would not be a mainstream brand.
Yes feminism too, it's a social and political issue and the livers should not be permitted to make comments on it.
>What are Uki's "brand of politics" that are so extreme that only "5% of the general population" would stand behind them?Uki is a transgender man who was posting suicide hotlines on his main account when Donald Trump won the presidency. He's made some extremely radical anti-white and anti-American political statements that are very inflammatory. He claims that gay people are under threat of extermination and have to fight at all costs to survive. Why is he saying these things without any management oversight?
>Saying you're fine with gay people may lose you subscribers, but it wouldn't hurt the brand all that much.Do you think that bashing Christianity is probably a bad idea in an overwhelmingly-christian country? That's not a smart move for a corporation, you just alienated most of the population against you. Why would you do that? Notice how almost no other corporation is doing that.
>This is genuine, actual racism being put on a pedestal.That would be Uki actually