Thread 101392678

Why do most European chuubas speak American on stream?

>>101392678 (OP)
unrelated image?

Almost every German chuuba I know speaks German on stream, you may count the ones that speak English on one hand.
They don't, you just don't see them because you're EOP.

>>101392678 (OP)
Embarrassing display, OP.

Gr8 b8 m8

>Wake up in the morning
>Go to mirror of your rulers allow you to have one
>sigh
>Watch American news, fap to the thought of eating a star spangled hot dog
>Feel jealous of Americans
>Spend so much time on America that you get their accent and probably know more about Americans than Americans do
>Turn on your phone and listen to the star spangled banner as everything loads up
>Load your Vtuber model onto your European computer that has the white house your background wallpaper
>Say you hate America as you fantasize about climbing Mt. Rushmore as your fan base looks at your beans and toast butt
>Load into Youtube and fantasize about how it was an American made start up that let's you get close to America
>chat shows up, unaware you're going to play a game made by American devs
>Watch as the tower of babel says 20 different greetings as you look longingly at the bald eagle poster adjacent to your work station.
>stream for hours while trying to hide the fact that you have a collection of U.S. President Bobble heads
It's just the way the world is OP

>>101392724
Isn't she dutch?

>>101393367
No she's a whore

>>101393367
wut? No

>>101392678 (OP)
Almost everyone in Europe can speak English. If you're an expat you can get on fine in pretty much anywhere in western Europe due to this fact.

>>101393367
She's American you fucking retard

If european then why have American dirt city moron accent?

>>101392678 (OP)
>all english is american

>>101394745
Bro a lot of British people sound like Americans these days

>>101392799
German is such a disgusting language, I was forced to learn it in school, thankfully I don't remember any of it now, making me retroactively ESL.

>>101393367
Trust me, you can clearly indentify dutch people whenever they speak English

>>101392678 (OP)
Wrong whaleslut?

I could have sworn I heard about her having sex with a guy in Denmark

>>101396123
THERE ARE MEN IN DENMARK!?

>>101392678 (OP)
Because most europeans speak at least 2 languages and one of them is english

>>101394262
She's some flavor of SEA, dumbass

>>101392678 (OP)
>bao european
Delete this whole thread please

>try to make a shylily bait thread
>can't even tell the difference between her and bao

Why is her ass so fat?

>>101398598
Born in America, raised speaking English? Are you retarded?

>>101395585
At least it's better than Indog, Pajeet or Chinese

>>101398775
That decides the text in her passport, not what she is, dumb fuck.

>>101398598
>>101398775
Cut him some slack, most Americans are illiterate and can't speak English well.

>>101394262
Bao is vietnamese, she fleshstreams sometimes.

>>101399552
this year she vtubes sometimes

>>101393367
I think you're thinking of Shylily. Although isn't Shy a German living in the Netherlands?

>>101399592
rainhoe is the dutch one

>>101399422
Well, that, AND THEIR FUCKING ACCENT, you absolute esl mongrel.

>>101399592
she's Polish

>>101399592
nah shylily is still in germany. She even told a story of being harassed by a food delivery guy, who she was VERY adamant in denying he wasn't brown (he was brown).

>>101399662
And again, that has nothing to do with what she IS, because she's some flavor of SEA. She fucking streams with a cam on, are you blind?

>>101399723
Don't even bother this idiot can't even tell the basic different between nationality and race.

I bet he one of those Anon who said Biboo is 100% American and not a Asian American / Thai American bcs she born in the US and there for her mother Thai heritage never exist.

>>101392678 (OP)
>>> European chubas
>>> Post Bao image.

Nice joke Anon but srly you do know Bao is Vietnamese right?

Those that do speak English on stream do sound more american than British (besides first of all having their native accent) because English media isn't as relevant as american (plus they're an american tributary state now that they left the EU)

>>101392678 (OP)
You expect them to be taught British English?

>>101399552
>y-you're not a real American if you're yellow
Go back to /pol/

>>101392678 (OP)
>European chuubas
>post Vietnamese-American woman
???

>>101401771
>ESL doesn't understand difference between nationality and ethnicity

>>101401828
Seething /#/niggers can't tell indies apart, pleez undahstan

I'll never forgive Laimu for putting on an American accent instead of going full British.
I'll forgive Shondo because my dick can't be mad at her.

>>101401887
Wtf are you even talking about. She's fucking American, I don't know how many times I have to repeat this. I don't care what her ethnicity is. The original point was you claimed she was Dutch, which she definitely fucking isn't.

>>101401954
I never claimed she was Dutch, she's Vietnamese with American nationality.

>>101401954
Now what Dafuq are "You" even talking about? No one claim Bao is Dutch bcs she a freaking Vietnamese American

>>101402100
>no one
The entire chain started because someone claimed she was you illiterate retard.

>>101399427
>>101401771
>>101401954
>Americans
>having to explain
>to Europeans
>that being born in a stable does not make one a horse
GRIM.

>>101392678 (OP)
thats where all the money is. they aren't called europoors for nothing

>>101402458
Doesn't that mean only native Americans can call themselves American? A white American's only claim to fame over a Vietnamese American is that his ancestors have lived in the country for a couple of more generations.

>>101392678 (OP)
This one is a Vietnamese hooker though?

>>101405094
>Only native Americans can call themselves American
Yes - as in those who are descended from the original White Anglo settlers. The Indians, on the other hand, have no claim to be Americans whatsoever, because they are totally different nations from us. Our country is different from the ones they occupied in the past, because we were the ones who built it in the first place.
>A White American's only claim to fame over a "Vietnamese American" (contradiction in terms, lol)
>Is that his ancestors have lived in the country for a couple more generations
Because their ancestors built it. Which is another unique, particular moral claim to legitimate dominion that no other peoples can claim. Their ancestors were the original settlers and founding stock, the descendants of whom are the same people.
You seem to be under the impression that a nation or country is just an area of land, as under the Westphalian model of statehood. But that's not correct. A nation IS the people, not the land - always has been. Likewise, a country isn't just the land either, but the physical and metaphysical place, society, civilization, etc. that was constructed by a nation in its territory.

>>101393295
Fun fact: The British were actually trying to undercut Colonial unrest by selling them DISCOUNTED Tea that still had a tax on it, just to test their resolve. The test clearly failed.

>>101407537
>Yes - as in those who are descended from the original White Anglo settlers. The Indians, on the other hand, have no claim to be Americans whatsoever, because they are totally different nations from us.
You're contradicting yourself. If the native Americans are not considered American because they lived in a different nation than modern Americans, then the same is also true for the original European settlers, because they arrived on the continent centuries before the US was founded and therefore lived in a different nation than the modern America. Also keep in mind that the US wasn't the size it is now back when it was founded. Louisiana for example was purchased from France while Alaska was purchased from Russia, and Hawaii hadn't even been discovered by westerners yet at the time the US declared its independence. These territories were simply incorporated into the US at a later date, just like the territories of the native Americans. If being incorporated into the union doesn't make the native Americans proper Americans, then the same also applies to the original denizens of most US states and to their descendants as well. Only those present at the very beginning of the US would qualify.

>Because their ancestors built it.
What percentage of modern day white Americans can trace their origins to the first settlers? Given how many Europeans immigrated to the country after it had been founded, in particular during the 1900s, that number should be pretty small. According to this source which may or may not be valid, that number is 3-10%: https://www.restonyc.com/what-percentage-of-americans-have-an-ancestor-on-the-mayflower/
What this means is that by your definition, most white Americans are not actually American either. That's a very strange standard.

>A nation IS the people, not the land
A people can exist without a nation or land, and a nation can also be formed out of a multitude of different peoples. Clearly those two concepts are not exactly the same. Americans are barely even a people in the first place given how muttified they are.

>>101409194
>According to this source which may or may not be valid, that number is 3-10%
NTA but the mayflower was just one ship and Plymouth Colony wasn't the first. Many other English settlers contributed to building America. The fact that as many as 10% of Americans have an ancestor from the 50 or so surviving Mayflower voyagers is pretty incredible.

>>101401951
Idk why Laimu does that, especially since she still says like 20% of words with a clear british accent. its kinda funny though.
but Shondo actually just sounds like that because she grew up almost never leaving the house and listening to american media.

>>101409194
>You're contradicting yourself. If the native Americans are not considered American because they lived in a different nation than modern Americans, then the same is also true for the original European settlers, because they arrived on the continent centuries before the US was founded and therefore lived in a different nation than the modern America.
Wrong. We are the SAME nation as those settlers, because we are descended from them. The only thing that changed is that we founded our own new STATE - the Union. But that is distinct from the nation, because the nation is the people, not the state. There is no contradiction.
>Also keep in mind that the US wasn't the size it is now back when it was founded. Louisiana for example was purchased from France while Alaska was purchased from Russia, and Hawaii hadn't even been discovered by westerners yet at the time the US declared its independence. These territories were simply incorporated into the US at a later date, just like the territories of the native Americans.
All irrelevant, because nation = people, not territory. We, along with different sub-nations who intermixed to varying degrees, simply settled those territories later.
>If being incorporated into the union doesn't make the native Americans proper Americans, then the same also applies to the original denizens of most US states and to their descendants as well.
Not in the case of Anglo settlers, such as those who were paid to settle the 99% empty territory of Texas by the Mexicans. In the case of other territories settled by distinct founding stock, such as the Swedes and Germans, I agree that they WERE separate - until large scale intermixing occurred, thus creating mutt populations who descend from both nations, and are thus American.
>Only those present at the very beginning of the US would qualify.
Nope. Anyone who is descended from that original founding stock is also included in the true American ethnos, as explained.

>What percentage of modern day white Americans can trace their origins to the first settlers?
The same percentage as are actual Americans.
>Given how many Europeans immigrated to the country after it had been founded, in particular during the 1900s, that number should be pretty small.
Correct, although as explained, you have to account for the intermixing of lineages. Any who did not descend from the Anglo settlers are not Americans; likewise, anyone who does not descend from the settlers of any particular town, region, etc. cannot claim to be part of THAT area's native nation, which happens to be part of the large tribal confederation that bears the name of "USA".
>According to this source which may or may not be valid, that number is 3-10%: https://www.restonyc.com/what-percentage-of-americans-have-an-ancestor-on-the-mayflower/
Correct, most US *CITIZENS* today are not what are colloquially called WASPS, and are therefore not actually Americans. Blame JFK, (((Emmanuel Celler))), the 1960s Community Relations Service-sanctioned "civil rights" psyop, and the deluded adherents of Lincolnite "propositional nation" brainrot for inflicting us with that particular condition. Like I said, there are other, similar genetic clades who are native to their respective regions, and they are their own nations - it's basically just a polite lie when we say they are also "Americans" in the same sense as the Anglo WASPs, one of many told for the sake of propping up what is essentially a tranny state that is effectively untethered to ANY nation.
>What this means is that by your definition, most white Americans are not actually American either.
Yes.
>That's a very strange standard.
No. It's the norm throughout history. What's "strange" is the confused mental gymnastics people have been programmed with for the sake of justifying the post-enlightenment liberal order.
>A people can exist without a nation or land, and a nation can also be formed out of a multitude of different peoples.
You're contradicting yourself. If a people exists, they are by definition a nation, regardless of territory or statehood - look at the Kurds or the pre-Balfour Declaration Ashkenazim for examples of nations without a state, and the classical Greek city states or feudal Japan for an example of one nation with many states.
>Clearly those two concepts are not exactly the same.
Nation == people == ethnos == extended blood family descended from a common stock of ancestors =/= land/state. That's how these concepts relate.
>Americans are barely even a people in the first place given how muttified they are.
Again - see (((Emannuel Celler))), (((Israel Zangwill))), (((Emma Lazarus))), and others throughout history for utterly destroying the presumed, unspoken Anglo homogeneity of which so many Founders spoke so fondly and which they took for granted. Now the nucleus of the American nation exists, but is a minority in its own homeland. Never mind the subsidiary nations that over time might have been grafted on.

>>101412664
Holy shit go back to /his/ and hang out with the haploniggers already

>>101396123
this is bao. news she fucked a man in x isn't surprising at all. normally i would phrase this as some kind of dunk or insult, but apparently she has legit medical/hormonal issues that cause her to be feral, which does check out and while rare does happen

>>101396123
Yeah, apparently she was also molested as a child and it causes her to crash out sexually, in all honesty she needs a psychiatrist

Europe invented America

>>101392724
i know, she's from new york

what's OP even thinking

>>101412664
Chat why is this post so fuckin big
@grok What does this shit say

>>101412664
>We are the SAME nation as those settlers, because we are descended from them
The original settlers were not the ones who founded the nation, their distant descendants were. Some of the original ones even went back to Europe before the US was founded. Are they permanently American too just because they spent a little bit of time in the American continent before the country's founding? I don't think so.
>All irrelevant, because nation = people, not territory.
It is relevant, because the Spanish in Florida were not the same people as the French in Louisiana. Many of them were not mixed with the Anglos either.
>The same percentage as are actual Americans.
I asked what number that is, because your definition makes it extremely difficult to figure out whether someone is American. Even genetic tests can't differentiate between an Anglo who arrived on the Mayflower, one who arrived just before the declaration of independence and one who migrated there last year. Historical documents and family trees are the only way and they obviously don't even exist for all the people who would otherwise fit your definition, never mind any paternity fraud or bastard children.
>No. It's the norm throughout history.
No it's not. The historical norm is to simply go by ethnicity, i.e. the ethnic British are the people of Britain and the ethnic French are the people of France, and so on. You only have to come up with this weird definition where being American depends on whether a mutt of various European stocks has a drop of Anglo settler blood in them because American is not an ethnic group (except for the native Americans) in the way European peoples are. In Europe, someone who's 5% British and 95% French/Spanish/German/Swedish/Italian/whatever would not be considered a Brit because they are not ethnically one. In your view, that 5% would be enough to make someone an American, as long as it came from the Anglo settlers. That has never been the norm, ever.
>You're contradicting yourself.
Where? You are the one who defined people as a nation, not me. I'm contradicting you, as one would if one is trying to argue against someone.
>Nation == people == ethnos == extended blood family descended from a common stock of ancestors =/= land/state
The definition of a nation is different from that of a people or an ethnic group. The "extended blood family" part is something you came up with and you only had to put that there because Americans are not an ethnic group, which actually contradicts the equality you established between people and ethnos just before that. A mulatto who is 5% Anglo, i.e. "extended blood family", and 95% Congolese is not ethnically Anglo. He's just a mutt.
>for utterly destroying the presumed, unspoken Anglo homogeneity
They destroyed that themselves. You yourself brought up how they mixed with the Swedes and the Germans. Some Jew spouting nonsense isn't going to do a thing to your blood, but you having kids with a person from a different ethnic group will.

>>101402458
>cope
>cope
>cope
>COPE
I hope you're not taking this too hard.

>>101418376
I mean it's literally named after a southern European explorer, so yes. They named it after him, and then dumped their convicts and retards there to extract resources.

>>101398775
She's going back

>>101392678 (OP)
>speak American

>>101392678 (OP)
>speak American

>>101401951
At least Laimu still sounds a little British. Some vtubers like Saiiren have completely eliminated their accent.

>>101392678 (OP)
Because the UK doesn't make a lot of movies and tv shows.

>>101399723
You deserve to be raped and beheaded
*rapes and beheads you*

>>101405094
No, the founders of a country are native to that country too.

>>101431225
I've had enough of your libtard prattle

>>101430855
>>101426189
american and eglish are different and you know it

>>101431624
I haven't had enough of raping your neck hole

>>101392724
She is eurotrash at heart

>>101392678 (OP)
anon stop this joke. It wasn't funny when you tried with ironmouse it's not funny when you try with shylily. It only makes you look like a retard, unless being public shame is your kink so please keep going.

>>101434915
He is merely pretending

>>101434915
iron mouse isn't even american though. she puetro rican

>>101392678 (OP)
>implies they would watch Europeans Vtubers to begin with
>might not even watch anyone that speaks French
>asks obvious question

many such cases

>>101434915
Ironmouse is Mexican

>>101436527
Puerto Rico is literally part of America.

>>101392678 (OP)
if you are really curious despite posting a bait picture, i'll tell you why - from experience
i live in europe and have lived here for my whole life, never stepped outside my country where we don't speak english and most people my age were not good at speaking english, we learn it but barely
the thing about english speaking european chuubas that aren't from UK is that we have learned english from games/movies/tv shows - most of them being american since no game in 2000s was translated by the british, it was always done by the americans
the accent seeps through and the way words are written too, so what we learned was the american version of the english language

>>101436614
Is it though

>>101436761
Yes

>>101436761
Not as a state but as a commonwealth. They have their own government, you can travel there without a passport, but it doesn't have representation in congress.

>>101438313
i personally do not consider them americans

>>101392678 (OP)
Because yurocucks are poor and don't spend money and only Japanese and Americans keep this hobby alive. Hope that helps.

>>101424189
>Their distant descendants were
No, they fucking weren't. Their distant descendants founded the US, which is a state, not a nation.
>The Spanish in Florida were not the French in Louisiana
So? That doesn't make anything you said relevant.
>I asked what that number is
Why? It's sophistry to say that because , it doesn't exist
>The historical norm is to go by ethnicity
>"Nuh uh, the norm is to go by ethnicity!"
This is like if I told you something like "all three sided objects are triangles", and you replied by holding up a three sided object and saying "nuh uh, this is a triangle!"
>"""ethnic British"""
>ETHNIC
>BRITISH
Yeah, as expected, you don't even know what an ethnic group is.
The inescapable fact of the matter is, the definition of nation, people and ethnos are all the same, as illustrated by the many examples I gave which you cannot refute. Americans - i.e., WASPs - are an ethnic group, so the "contradiction" YOU made up in your own head by denying biological reality like a troon has no bearing on anything.
I also love how you contradict yourself and agree with me by pointing out that the 95% French/Spanish/German/etc. is ethnically who he's biologically descended from. Or do you think that genetics has nothing to do with ancestry?
That has, absolutely and inarguably, been the universal human norm across all of history, across every continent. As you would know if you knew the first thing about ethnogenesis, ethnography, and the founding mythologies of different peoples around the world. Look at the Germanic tribal nations, Scottish clans, the Levantine peoples like Ammonites and Moabites and so on literally taking the name of their patras in many cases, the Israelites and later Jews determining whether a child was one of theirs based on the child's mother (this is a big reason why they had extensive geneaologies going all the way back to their ethnic patriarch, aptly named... Israel), or the founding myth of the Aztecs... this is not controversial, anon. It's universal.
I'm not "coming up with" a definition of ethnicity which means... ethnicity, and the historically normal definition I'm using isn't "weird". The WASPS underwent a distinct ethnogenesis and are genetically different from the Anglos who remained in England, who went to settle Australia, etc. due to centuries of genetic sorting, relative geographic isolation, etc. Again, the founding fathers of the republic wrote about this themselves.
>Durrr the Amerindians are an ethnic group or something
Wrong again. You don't have the first clue what you're talking about.
In North America, various "native" groups were (and are) phenotypically and culturally distinct. They were defined peoples. The Apache, a raiding people, looked and lived differently than the Cherokee.
picrel, also see https://xcancel.com/0xAlaric/status/1870560053389914287#m for further reading.
>They destroyed that themselves
Nope. Read history. The fact that there were different nations in the midwest, great plains, and elsewhere who were in the process of being grafted onto the WASP ethnic nucleus without destroying it is not remotely comparable to the utter chaos and deterritorialization of their OWN ancestral lands that happened after the 1960s.
By your facile logic, if ANY amount of genetic assimilation of a subordinate ethnic group into the dominant group through intermarriage "destroys" the dominant ethnic group by altering their blood, irrespective of ANY other factors, then by your own standard the Anglo-Saxons "destroyed" their blood by becoming a mix of Anglo and Saxon. As did the French, Spaniards, etc. due to all being mixes of various Germanic, Latin and Celtic bloodlines. Oh, and so did the Chinese, due to the intermixing of different groups with the Han over millennia... need I go on?
Your model of this subject is distinctively modern, confused, nonsensical and self-defeating.

>>101440063
>*it's sophistry to say that because you can't say what exact percentage of a state's population, down to the individual, is a certain ethnic group, that the ethnic group doesn't exist
This is what I get for arguing with subverted retards first thing in the morning

>>101392678 (OP)
Whale

>>101392678 (OP)
Bao

>>101444390
>>101441625
blue

>>101446451
>>101444390
>>101441625
its a shame she decided to become a whore

>>101392678 (OP)
The USA is where the money is

>>101392678 (OP)
Why would anyone bother watching Bao?

>>101450024
The ass is fat

>>101407537
At one point Irish and Polish were also not considered Americans

>>101392678 (OP)
euro are poor. 20 usd in Europe is like whole month worth of rent

>>101450997
... correctly. They aren't Americans, they're Irish and Poles. They're STILL Irish and Poles, or at least offshoots from their diaspora.

>>101392678 (OP)
The word /pol/ will finish his job. There will never be war with Iran. No Rothschild bank ever harvest war installed in the just nation. For slavery to genocide vaxxine depopulant war on the world general public the Satan Star flag is affixed with his Christland Cross. And they adversary also his personal army will remain beholden to gift of power coming from 4chan. For Last Exorcism of Earth is without circumcision, and the whole Globalist New World Order is not up to the condition of victory to the last mastermadman.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/username/Nyggers/

>>101439017
They actually do have a seat in congress but they're not allowed to vote on anything, they just sit there

>>101402458
Sure it doesn't, but a Zebra who is born in a stable, raised like a horse, lives like a horse, speaks fluent horse, is mostly friends Horses, and has never once steps foot in Africa, is going to have a lot more in common with the average Horse than the average Zebra. Unless you genuinely believe that all Zebras inherit some sort of mystical ancestral memory of prancing through the savannah from their parents (retarded)

having read what this anon has written I will double down and say this now: Amerimutt racial purists are perhaps the most mentally retarded people on earth. the position is untenable on an entirely practical level, 10 to 20% of the country has your ancestry and almost all of those have two or three other things mixed into them. Heck even Anglos themselves are mutts: a product of Germans, Celts, Scandinavians, and Latins mixing in perhaps the most contrived series of events possible. What purity are you preserving? the 75% Norman-Welsh-Anglo-Danish mixture not corrupted by the other 25% of you that's Italian and Irish? What if you met a 100% pure ethnically Anglo-Saxon American who had been adopted and raised by two Iraqi Muslims? Do you greet him as a brother even though he thinks and acts nothing like you? as opposed to the Iraqi raised by two Anglo parents?

Ironically enough this anons ideas align far more with the very people this anon despises most than his fellow Anglos. You want to know who cares a lot about your haplogroup? Sand People whom blow themselves up aged 17 over a century old tribal feuds. A strong and mature culture, like Rome or Anglo-America, can unhinge its jaws and swallow other cultures whole: absorbing them into their unstoppable mass. Even better if it can get said culture to do it without spilling a drop of blood.

>>101450024
she collabed with someone i do watch

>>101392678 (OP)
>Spend years streaming in an American-centric website
>Exposed to Americans speaking all the time and how they speak English
>Gradually begin to Americanize your accent
Happened to Vei, whose British accent was nerfed into the ground. Also Saiiren, and especially Limes, who you can only tell is British when she's saying certain words.

>>101455844
>anon still believes in the integrationist meme in the year of our lord 2025
>he uses the worst possible example to explain why, accidentally sounds like a retard
No, anon. The zebra will not, in fact, have more in common with horses than other zebras. Because it's a fucking zebra. By definition, it has the very fundamental nature of its being in common with other zebras. As opposed to more superficial or contingent things like learned customs or language... kinda, sometimes, not really.
It's obvious to literally everyone who isn't a brainwashed blank-slate theorist liberal that you will never make the pitbull into a poodle, no matter how much Locke you read to it.
Also, there's a word for that "mystical ancestral memory" we inherit from our parents - it's called "genetics". Most behavioral traits, intelligence, dark triad traits, etc. are strongly heritable, like 0.6 if not higher. How this is meant to seem "retarded", of course, remains a mystery to those of us who don't require medication.

>>101457450
>The truth is untenable
>Force yourself to believe a lie out of fear of the consequences, because otherwise the system predicated on the dissolution of ethnicity will break down into civil war
>Because it was designed to do precisely that, like holding a gun to your head to force compliance with your own genocide
Mask status: slipped.
>The same old "every ethnic group is a mixture!" canard
And cake is a mixture of flour, eggs, milk, sugar, and other ingredients. Therefore, there is no such thing as "pure cake", and it will retain the essence of being "cake" no matter how much sushi, biltong, mashed potatoes and chicken noodle soup you mix in, right?
Or how about water, a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen - which means there's NO SUCH THING as "pure" water. The deionized dihydrogen monoxide you used in chemistry class was just as contaminated as a muddy puddle or the toilet bowl filler you'd find in the urinals.
Please tell me you see how insipidly fucking stupid this deconstructivist line of thinking is. If the genetic profile of a group at the time of ethnogenesis is a mixture of the constituent ethnicities of the group's founding stock, then that mixture is what defines the product, and is therefore the standard of purity.
>He unironically thinks the sandnigger would unironically have more in common with me because he was raised by some White shitlibs who got cucked by their warped morality into raising some foreigner's kid as a fashion accessory
You don't have a fucking clue, anon. Read the twin studies about the heritability of criminal behavior, or the research showing the increased levels of stress and psychopathy present in individuals who live in areas which are dominated by other races, or even an easily digestible book like "Selfish Reasons to Have More Kids" by Bryan Kaplan. Or, just fucking look at how well blacks were "Americanized" after integration led to them displacing Whites from their own cities and driving us into luxury refugee camps called suburbs - they turned Detroit from "the New Orleans of the Western Hemisphere" into an unfixable shithole along with any other city they infested, they commit violent crimes against us at twenty-nine times the rate we commit crimes against them per capita, they riot every few years over the "unfairness" of being held to the same standards as White people and then use their self-inflicted poverty as an excuse based on the imbecilic, crackpot "poverty causes crime" cope narrative, and they do aaaaaall of this while being given endless prerogatives by the system ranging from welfare, to privileged access to housing and business loans, to preferential consideration for federal jobs, to disparate impact doctrine, and so on. They never underwent some mass-transformation into The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. The propaganda didn't work, because it couldn't change their nature.
At best, the way a child is raised forms a psychic and cognitive mindprison; remove the constant indoctrination and brainwashing, and the individual's true nature will very quickly re-emerge, and barring some cases of unusually high mutagenic load or something, what they'll revert to is something pretty close to their parents. Because our natures are, themselves, a product of nature, not nurture.
The notion that you actually have more in common with foreigners LARPing as you than your literal kinsmen is not only slop for the naive and gullible, it's also morally repugnant that anyone could be so selfish and individualistic to even WANT it to be true. Anglos used to understand this, until the boomers came along.
The tragic consequence of the intelligentsia's predisposition towards rationalism is the tendency to choose reason over reality - rationalism over sensibility. It made them adopt a mass egalitarian delusion that makes the fucking towelheads actually look sane by comparison. Hopefully they ride the momentum of the last decade of increasing racial consciousness forward and finally snap out of it soon, or they're doomed.

tl;dr - you are a retard who doesn't understand anything, and you should strongly consider suicide.

>>101468072
Out of curiosity: What’s your opinion of the Irish?

>>101468072
>>101466252

Ah! a race realist citing the same 1977 Christiansen study for the billionth time. Yes criminal traits are heritable: if one identical twin commits a crime the other twin is about 50% more likely to engage in some form of criminal behavior as well. Its also in general fairly uncontroversial that Dark Triad and other traits that predispose you to crime are heritable.

The issue is that your reading evidently stopped there: I'd know because I was once like you before I did said reading. Almost every study into MAOA, probably the gene with the best evidence for relation to criminality, is only studied in Males facing significant childhood maltreatment as that's legitimately the only group that sees meaningful differences (see: Caspi et al 2002, Fergusson et al. 2012, Philippe A. Melas et. al. 2013), which is why you have bizarre statistical blips like asian men committing less violent crime than white men despite having a higher likelihood of possessing the low MAOA activity genes associated with it.
Even studies into the effects of specific gene combinations have turned up lack luster results in your favor: even some one with a perfect cocktail of impulsivity and dark triad producing genes only sees modest differences in criminality and almost exclusively under significant environmental stress (Waltes Regina Et. Al. 2015). Just because your computer has the specifications to run a game does not mean it automatically has it installed.
And that's not even mentioning that there's significantly more variation within ethnicities than between them: a skinhead and a crip in the prison yard very likely have more behavior controlling genes in common with each other than with their law-abiding counterparts of the same race.

>>101439854
Love how mutts still think Europe is poor despite having the same, and due to the now elevated exchange rate even greater, salary as themselves

>>101398598
>she's some flavor of sea
yeah, she's a whale

>>101392724
Huh

>>101470337
Anon, I know you're extremely overeducated and desperate to indulge your confirmation bias, but that doesn't excuse failing to properly read the posts you're referring to and clumsily falling into the exact same predictable epistemological snares that social constructivists always do.
Why do you think I cited Kaplan's book, among the SEVERAL citations I provided and which you are now conspicuously sidestepping? It was to illustrate that this exact, tired nurture-cultist cope you're engaging in right now is not meaningful. "Traumatic childhood experience" is not analogous to installing antisociality software, as per your analogy - being raised in a stable, law-abiding household, on the other hand, is essentially how you install "prosociality software" (and even then with fairly lackluster success, as you yourself admit). Software which does not change the subject's underlying wetware and will be promptly UNINSTALLED as soon as they've been removed from an environment that provides constant software updates through perpetual social reinforcement of norms and mores to force behavioral deviations from their genetic norm.
Remember: the topic of discussion is "what people have in common with you". In other words, it's not merely a question of what they do - it's a question of what they are, and of what they do *as a function* of what they are. The fact that your argument essentially boils down to "yeah but bugmen are prone to cultures of extreme collectivism and cultural conformity, which doesn't let them behave like the yakuza chimps they truly are deep down, and they only revert to that behavior if removed from that environment"... unwittingly reinforces my point that looking at behavioral differences alone is superficial - they represent mere software differences, as opposed to hardware or firmware. There's also various confounding variables which you fail to account for - off the top of my head, there's the East Asians' higher average intelligence in the upper-range normal midwit region, which I certainly hope you realize is a correlate of reduced criminality, along with a very narrow gene pool, indicating a race which has been strongly selected for cooperation and agreeableness and therefore prosociality, not unlike the Finns.
As for the skinhead/crip analogy - no, the "criminals have criminal genes in common" tautology does not in any way suggest there is "more variation within ethnicities than between them". That's a complete non-sequitur. If a law-abiding White is radically different from a criminal White, they'll be even MORE different from a criminal black or Asian; that means there's GREATER variability between races, not less. And this, again, is only if you isolate behavior-controlling genes and ignore the bulk of what makes people similar or different - when comparing genomes in their totality, you'll find that no, a 130IQ+ Anglo elite like Thomas Jefferson is not more similar to/does not in fact have more in common with a 130IQ+ black elite like Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell than he would with his own racemixing midwit brother, Randolph.
This nurturist, social constructivist fairy tale desperately needs to die already. It's been thoroughly blown out so so SO many times despite being pumped with steroids by rampant egalitarian ideologism and a disproportionate bulk of outright academic fraud within institutions, and the fact that so many people STILL mistakenly take it as gospel is a compelling argument in favor of the abolition of the public education system altogether.