>>102764546>no evidence of it being “deliberately hidden”Bad faith. Demanding evidence you know is impossible to obtain or present and insisting this lack of evidence is proof that you're correct.
>relevance is spotty at bestDeliberately pretending like something isn't relevant doesn't make it irrelevant.
>also subjectiveHer decisions and their consequences are a matter of public record.
>you are not obligated to private informationAn argument that she lied to protect her privacy, but it relies on the idea that she prioritizes her privacy. However, her announcement of her engagement proves that she does not prioritize her privacy. She's willing to be forthcoming about her private life when she wants to. And she didn't want to before.
>completely hypothetical scenario>but I did have breakfastRefusing to engage with a hypothetical is an admission you either don't understand it, or do understand it but don't want to because it succinctly illuminates the flaws on your rationale.
Stupid faggot. Stick to playing word games and victim blaming. You can't actually form a coherent argument in good faith.