>>6014420
>t. PhD
PhD in medical science?
>its physically impossible
whenever you read something like that about a sufficiently complex topic, you can be assured you are talking with a massive faggot that's way out of his depth and has no clue what he's talking about. i despise these faggots as much as i despise anyone else who claims to know anything about the climate with absolute certainty. it really is on par with the retards that say stuff like "if we don't cut carbon emmissions to net zero by 2050 then we will inevitably face 2.0°C warming."
so, let's see that math. show me how it is physically impossible to have a global surface temperature increase of 2--3°C within 250 years from 1850 onward by the amount of carbon emitted. let's see that complete and flawless line of reasoning for this one.
