Anonymous
6/13/2025, 4:34:42 AM No.40521096
Are they Christians?
Replies:
Thread 40521096 - /x/ [Archived: 1734 hours ago]
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 5:27:35 AM No.40521452
>>40521096 (OP)
doctrinally they deny Christ's bodily resurrection and say he wasn't God's son but Michael but they're not far enough off that i think they're all damned either.
My headcanon Jesus is pretty flexible.
doctrinally they deny Christ's bodily resurrection and say he wasn't God's son but Michael but they're not far enough off that i think they're all damned either.
My headcanon Jesus is pretty flexible.
Replies:
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 6:14:39 AM No.40521608
>>40521096 (OP)
>Are they Christians?
I don't know all their beliefs. Compare to the template to reach a final conclusion.
>Are they Christians?
I don't know all their beliefs. Compare to the template to reach a final conclusion.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 6:32:14 AM No.40521672
>>40521452
>deny Christ's bodily resurrection
(I assume you mean a fleshly bodily resurrection as opposed to a pneumatic bodily resurrection)
>say he wasn't God's son but Michael
(They say he's Michael the archangel, but they don't see that as incompatible with him being God's son.)
...Wow, so JWs are actually closer to the original Christianity than most. Who would've thought.
>deny Christ's bodily resurrection
(I assume you mean a fleshly bodily resurrection as opposed to a pneumatic bodily resurrection)
>say he wasn't God's son but Michael
(They say he's Michael the archangel, but they don't see that as incompatible with him being God's son.)
...Wow, so JWs are actually closer to the original Christianity than most. Who would've thought.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 6:40:54 AM No.40521703
Who really is, though?