If there has been a lot of so-called ESP'ers, spiritually enlightened, psychics, alien communicators and more; why did no one talk about Pluto having a heart-shaped feature on its surface?
I mean, surely there should have been at least ONE person talking about pluto's heart-shaped landmark before NASA visited it.

>>40522068 (OP)
Well let's assume you aren't a pathetic coward who asks a question when they mean to make a point.
So then we are accepting that Pluto has this feature, and that remote viewers have looked at Pluto, and asking why they never mentioned a geographical feature.
I would say because a remote viewer is most likely going to see things as if they were on the surface, and not specify "I want to see the planet from several thousand kilometers away".
So your question would be answered easily enough with "they didn't notice, they were too close to the surface."

>>40522068 (OP)
Pluto is very mysterious

(And most of those people are bullshitting)

>>40522224
Well, I mean you can argue that the ancients were able to perceive saturn as having rings despite the telescope supposedly been invented after the 15th century.
Why has no one mentioned pluto's heart shaped object hmmm? I mean, as an ESP'er, I would want to look at a planet/planetoid from far away and in every relevant angle.

>>40522273
>you can argue that the ancients were able to perceive saturn as having rings
1 - they had better eyes and patience and could see them from earth
2 - rings are VERY visible from the surface of Saturn, and not at all the same as having to be thousands of kilometers away to see a shape
> I mean, as an ESP'er, I would want to
But you aren't, and so what you would want is irrelevant.
Have you ASKED any remote viewers of Pluto whether THEY care about this?

is it bad when you have weird visions of something in orbit around a "planet" and they you end up seeing a picture of pluto and realize that was it?

>>40522068 (OP)

>>40522068 (OP)
Aren't plannets also supposed to be psychic or something.

Why this as an example in particular.

>>40522865
The better question is why are you answering for these remote viewers you so about when you aren't a remote viewer yourself as per your disposition hmmm?
>>40523510
Wut?

>>40522068 (OP)
If you believe that this is an actual photo of Pluto, your problem and also your answer starts right there.

Do you understand the logistics that would go into capturing a photo like this? Let alone the larger planets? Ever since the Space Race, the united states has been lying and altering information and especially CGI photos of planets. We can’t even go far enough to get an actual photo of EARTH. They openly and gladly admit that they use CGI to duplicate and render “what earth WOULD look like”

Sometimes the answers are simple.
We do not know what pluto looks like, and they are making educated guesses followed with CGI renditions of their claims.

>>40522068 (OP)
You can only astral project into the astral plane, the world you see in astral projection is merely a world created by the observances of people

>>40526180
No, that is a stupid question asked by people desperate to avoid attention.
I gave plausible answers to bad faith questions from an idiot making assumptions and too cowardly to simply put their claims out there.
Was that you? Are you the moron that has to say things by asking questions?

>>40526711
And what if the observances of people are really just your observances?
>>40526839
Don't be so mad. I'm just wondering why the ancients were able to see saturn's rings but not pluto's heart.

>>40522068 (OP)
ESP isn't real.
Remote viewing isn't real.
The "heart" you're seeing is pareidolia.

>>40527220
Yo daddy isn't real

>>40527229
Nah, he's pretty real and knows this stuff is BS too. Don't be mean. :(

>>40527187
Your wondering was answered.