>>40524056 (OP)Information physics completely supersedes the physics of energy, meaning-making is a process that is retrocausal, and this has been measured in the laboratory as well. Experiments timing the beginning of physiological responses to neurologically arousing images have demonstrated what has been termed the presentiment effect, activation of the nervous system seconds BEFORE the stimulus is presented to the viewer. Control images provide a dataset showing that this isn't an anticipatory "false start" because it the data shows significant correlation with the randomly selected/ordered target images. Your emotional responses start before the excitation event itself, consciousness somehow detecting future information or passing it backwards to itself. Rather, we might imagine an information space that is untethered from spacetime. Another point of comparison is remote viewing research, which similarly demonstrates "information leaks" achieved by consciousness somehow bringing in data about distant locations and both future and past conditions. I've barely seen any research on psychometry, pulling information from objects by touch (sight alone is enough to establish a link for some people), but the general claims essentially describe a form of remote viewing/data siphoning using the object as a sort of search filter.
I'm reading Vallee's Forbidden Science vol 6, published diary entries covering the 2010s; he's very much interested in the same sorts of information science based view of the supernatural, UFOs, psychic phenomena, and synchronicity. He keeps teasing throughout the books about personal experiments and dabbling he must be doing and it seems he's done remote viewing, conjured light orbs to his home, and wrote fiction novels with plot details that have described key points in UFO research that would only emerge decades later, as if predicting them or somehow authoring the future itself. He also describes a number of synchronicities in his life.
