Are the Freemasons actually Knights Templar?
>>40529507 (OP)The book Born in Blood basically says that they are. It shows how the old Freemasons basically had words in their ritual terms and other aspects of the Craft which pointed to the KT. I would recommend that book and the good thing is that it's free online.
IMG_7429
md5: 9e5d29cdfcf54961faecb9c1dd25ecf8
🔍
>>40529507 (OP)It’s a LARP, bro.
They are the knights templar in the same way that edgy /pol/ users “are Nazis”, or how moronic socialism advocates “are communists”.
>Are the Freemasons actually Knights Templar?Not really, but yes.
No, modern masons don't even have the real rite of the master anymore. They lost it along with the name that is the foundation of their "quest" after the failed jacobite rebellion
>>40529507 (OP)So one of the branches of Freemasons is Knights Templar, but its not the original organisation
They live in my town
They are crazy bastards
>>40530215Happens, they say they wear capes at night and drink blood
>>40529507 (OP)>Are the Freemasons actually Knights Templar?Nope, they're a expensive Fanfic from KT.
>>40529507 (OP)yes, very good but it doesnt matter. the pillars are joaquin and boaz.
ra hypnotizes the masses, youre free. you might be jewish.
>>40529507 (OP)Kinda. The Templars learned it and brought it back with them and thats where it morphed into Freemasonry.
>>40529507 (OP)Scottish rite 33rd degree masons are known as knights templar
My question is where the Asclepian-Pythagorean Essenes ended and the Proto-Gnostic Neoplatonists that blurred into Catholic-Mithraism (at least publicly) began.
How do we get from Solomon to Joseph (of Arimathea) to Míl Espáine?
Finally, was "Gaedhal Glas" a real person?