>mid 2000s
>everyone in the world starts to carry a phone with a camera at all times
>yet NOBODY has ever taken a picture of a ghost, demon, or angel
I'm starting to think that's proof they don't exist.
>inb4 mental gymnastics like "b-but the Bible says ghosts can't be captured on film"
>>40574692 (OP)They don't exist on the 3D, since they don't posses a physical body nor they aren't able to, because its incoherent to laws of physics and biology.
These entities live on a 5D, they have no shape or way of acting, they are energies that exist deeply on our mind
>>40574732Actually they live in 2d, like Nextbots in GMOD. Santa Claus is the only 5d being
>>40574692 (OP)>quickly moves to make "The ArgumentTM" pre-invalid so he doesn't have to engage with itDoing this earns you getting kicked in the teeth.
Spirits are definitionally subtle bodies which means they only exist perceptually, and are in between "hard matter beings" and "pure hallucination". They cannot be imagistically captured by any medium except first person memory. Get fucking killed.
>>40574910I know who's behind this post
>>40574910>Spirits are definitionally subtle bodies which means they only exist perceptually, and are in between "hard matter beings" and "pure hallucination"And what verified authority did you get this supposed information from? Don't tell me you... made it up... in your head.... pffftttHAHAHA
>>40574944Hundreds of years of dialectics by the church fathers, moron.
>>40574692 (OP)I've seen a cloud shaped exactly like Great Britain 3 times but by the time i got my phone camera ready the resemblance had vanished. Photographing transient objects is hard. Ghosts aren't real, but im just saying
>>40575911It's 2025, your phone should be in your hands outside at all times in case you need to take a picture of something
>>40574692 (OP)They have actually; rather there are purported Ghost images. At the same time those cameras are really low rez so whatever. Faggots gonna gag and time moves on.
Ghosts hide from cameras because they're shy.
>>40576612That's why you gotta sneak up on them
>>40574692 (OP)>I'm starting to think that's proof they don't exist.Atheists in charge of logic and understanding burden of proof.
Also, ghosts aren't real.
why hasnt anyone taken a picture of germs with their cellphone huh? checkmate rogancastbro
>>40574692 (OP)Have you looked for pictures of ghosts, demons or angels? Do you assume that if people took such photos, they would be widely seen and not assumed to be fake?
>>40577701THIS is why ghost pics aren't more widely circulated, the horror. It's too much. The horror.
Literally every photo or video of anything online is called fake without even evidence actually proving it. the gimbal video was called fake and debunked like a decade ago just tobbe confirmed real. you retarded skeptics will always deny and reject all potential evidence and then say theres no evidence.
kill yourself bitch
if you use a phone with a camera you *are* the ghost.
>>40577850>the gimbal videoAliens aren't ghosts retard
Now post some of your "real" ghost pictures that are supposedly posted online
>>40574692 (OP)>I'm starting to think that's proof they don't exist.A powerful supernatural entity could probably avoid cameras if desired. Bigfoot on the other hand...
>>40574944Dion Forture physchic self-defense.
The visible spectrum is a variable.
CMOS colour sensitivity is not.
>>40580796It's a pseudonym so... idk.
>>40580280This is not a reliable text.
>>40574692 (OP)tons of pictures online. people just dont believe the pictures when they see them. try taking pictures of ghosts yourself. they're pretty easy to capture. just go to some kind of haunted tourist spot and start snapping pictures you'll get one.
the world is ordained retard signs only make themselves available to those they are meant to. everything is orchestrated so you're not gonna get proof unless you're supposed to because your eyes would just glide right over it.
>>40577850>there’s no evidence of ghosts Look at this photo of a ghost
>fakeYou didn’t even look at it
>some faggot already deboonked it
>>40574692 (OP)but there are gorrilions of videos. In fact there's so many that you can find legit ghost videos among the top mainstream reaction youtubers too
>>40574692 (OP)If you saw a picture of one you'd assume it was fake so they're still impossible to prove, stop making these threads retard.
>>40581597So... you're retarded
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dion_Fortune
>>40574692 (OP)Look up bizarrebub dumbass, he's got thousands of videos of poltergeists; some photos of legit ghosts.
>>40574692 (OP)I have photos of REAL DEMONS.
Regular cameras don't work.
You need thermal or infrared cameras.
Those actually work. I have captured some of the most demonic shit I've ever seen b4
>>40585682>I have photos of REAL DEMONS.Post them you fucking coward
probably because people either drop it or forget it? like you gotta be real if you saw some fucking host or demon right infront of you there would be wayy more pressing matters on your mind than whipping out your phone or some shit
>>40585666Bro uses a content creator, who mades content as a living to feed a website reliant of distracting sheeple.
Your eyes receive light and translate that into a strictly internal phenomenon known as sight. So, you don’t actually see reality; you see a projection of reality based on the input from your eyes — an approximation.
If ghosts exist, and I believe they do, it’s entirely possible that they aren’t a phenomenon related to light. Instead, they’re a psychic phenomenon existing entirely in the mind.
One related topic that could serve as an analogy is liminal spaces. The feeling you get when viewing one isn’t based on anything that your eyes are seeing but rather your conscious reaction to it. Ghosts might be like liminal spaces in that they both require thought.
That said, there have been many pictures of ghosts. The modern issue is that photoshopping or staging such photos is trivially easy. Many are debunked, but perhaps some of them can’t be.
>>40574692 (OP)>>yet NOBODY has ever taken a picture of a ghost, demon, or angelthey do
you just say it's "dust" or "photoshop"
People take pics of bigfoot
>That's nothing but a blurry mess or fake, why not take better pictures lol.
Photos of big cats in the UK
>Obviously all just regular cats.The DNA evidence showing panthers are in the area proves nothing.
Weird shit on camera that has a shape of a human
>Just an artifact or a lens flare, nothing more.
UFO photos and videos
>Obviously a drone, satellite, plane, balloon or a fake
Doorbell camera sees an orb pass by
>A bug on the lens or dust
There's an absolute fuckton of pictures and videos out there and without a fail they're all called fakes.
Besides a lot of this shit happens so spontaneously that you're simply not able to get your phone out and film it, even if that was your first course of action.