Are there any books that teach you the basics and help you get better at kinetic skills with real practice and exercises?
Some books go over unique kinds of kinesis, but I haven't come across one that covers a bunch of them and is fully focused on that topic, or they are always the same ones (telepathy, telekinesis, healing and astral projection).
I'm missing pyrokinesis, hydrokinesis, aerokinesis and much more.

>>40583285 (OP)
drop you list first if you want anyone to help you. can't take without giving

>>40583285 (OP)
Technically shapeshifting, size manipulation, elasticity, attraction, chameleon l, agility, intellect, invisibility, invulnerability, stamina, super hearing, unarmed combat, radar sense and immortality must be the same
Here, made it easy for you op. You just need to become a shapeshifter

https://archive.org/details/@russrunge

Has any book you need for free

>>40584276
List about what? I've got over 200 pdf /x/books and none describes something like pyrokinesis, it's all astral projection, intuition, breathing, meditation and lucid dreaming. What kind of book are you looking for?
>>40584330
>>40584378
Thanks

>>40584422
anything with a tangible real world effect that can't just be chopped up to luck, coincidence or confirmation bias. I know that stuff exists but from what I have seen it's kept under pretty tight wraps so any books that do tell you that stuff (literally anything) would be interesting.

>>40584451
I don’t think anyone gonna teach shapeshifitng in a book man.
Your best bet is to learn from a shaman, and to make it a success, it helps to learn about shamanism and their traditions, and there are lots of book about that

>>40584451
Maybe look up into scientific papers on meditation, specifically vipassana or breathing techniques/pranayama or CIA papers on Gateway Process, but you may think they have confirmation bias, so I can't tell

>>40584481
by confirmation bias I mainly mean people who are diluted into thinking there rituals led to them happening upon a 20$ bill after doing 6 months of LOA or some stupid shit like that. I have read a few of those CIA papers and they do seem legit although I haven't shifted through all of them

>>40584512
They might be legit; but a)they must be unreliable as fuck for cia to release them or b) they must have something way better now
I mean you don’t see them disclose Abraham tanks armors, do you?
Which is more dangerous? Knowing how to create armor for your tanks? Or knowing how to access military secrets in your home(remote viewing)?

>>40583285 (OP)
bump

>>40584533
as for remote viewing I would honestly have to say A as even the best viewers have like 50% accuracy but for many of the other things like there articles on qi were prob declassified because they could not test for it themselves and as such did not need to remain classified as any countermeasures developed for it can't be used on the US if no one in the US can do these things anyways. (https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00792R000300400002-9.pdf does not have a subject from north America or Europe in it only two from china and it offers no explanation of how to accomplish the feats described)