Anonymous
6/23/2025, 8:03:07 PM No.40588930
I always hear people saying the military ("the" generally referring to the USA) has technology that's easily a decade or more beyond what is publicly disclosed or at least commercially available. I'm inclined to believe this, but I've always wondered: if that were the case, why do market booms centred around the next tool of subjugation (say, Palantir data aggregators or LLMs for example) seem to occur naturally with the types of bumps, errors and setbacks that would occur if it were being developed in the present, instead of simply releasing what they had been working on for a decade up to that point?
Assuming it is true, what are the chances that the UAP phenomena that get posted here all the time are 'our' technology we just don't know about yet? I see in a lot of them that the ships tend to leave shortly after being observed. Does this mean they have a kind of receiver detection for the visible light spectrum like they do with RF? Or is it some kind of quantum device that warns the crew when an observer triggers a wave function collapse?
Same goes for V2K, etc.
Pic unrel, but you should look into Coherent Change Detection / Synthetic Aperture Radar as it's pretty scary
Assuming it is true, what are the chances that the UAP phenomena that get posted here all the time are 'our' technology we just don't know about yet? I see in a lot of them that the ships tend to leave shortly after being observed. Does this mean they have a kind of receiver detection for the visible light spectrum like they do with RF? Or is it some kind of quantum device that warns the crew when an observer triggers a wave function collapse?
Same goes for V2K, etc.
Pic unrel, but you should look into Coherent Change Detection / Synthetic Aperture Radar as it's pretty scary
Replies: