life is suffering, but why?

God thought it’d be funny

Schopenhauer was a midwit

>>40600557 (OP)
“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:” (Romans 5:12)

suffering is the mechanism behind enlightenment
it takes many lifetimes of suffering to acquire true buddha-tier enlightenment, and in the end you'll be free from ever reincarnating again

All conditioned things are inconstant.
By clinging onto conditioned things, your mind becomes liable to the suffering of those things.
When they change to be disagreeable, you suffer because you don't want that thing to be disagreeable. When they change to be agreeable, you suffer because you want it to be more pleasant.

Ignorance.
Specifically ignorance of God's will, which is always correct and always manifested intentionally and completely.

So the monkey wants a banana. God gives him a strawberry. And the monkey suffers.
To prevent suffering the monkey should instead want the strawberry because God knows better than the monkey.

You're welcome.

>>40600557 (OP)
basically, nerds whine

>>40600557 (OP)
It's about your karma.

>>40600571
Though compared to you, he was a genius

Why do you keep a cow fenced in on a farm? To extract its milk

>>40601320

>>40600583
so why did we incarnate ?

>>40600557 (OP)
Because it feels so good when it ends.

>>40600557 (OP)
a life of suffering is a life of suffering anon

everything is as it is

>>40600571
>Schopenhauer was a midwit
2018 -- the year the term "midwit" began to be exclusively used by midwits.

Life is only suffering for people about 125 IQ with an inner monologue.

spiritualists are enlightened
philosophers are materialist and confused

>>40600557 (OP)
to think, to achieve something, I don't like the word "prophecy" because people have used it to ego-trip, to make up events that won't happen, to predict false events that rile people up for nothing.
I think because of that, the words "destiny" and "fate" are way more accurate, Although it could be argued that they are used to justify (somewhat) meaningless lives of others, to spice their lives up even though it may not be exactly true, i don't think it's particularly set that people will achieve great things if their "fate" demands it, i think it's more of like a loose string to tie all of us together, to interact, to speak, to converse, to cause actions that domino into something bigger, in some cases it may even be controlled by the littlest of actions, to cause something or to steer something, that or all of this is untrue and it's random.
my opinion? Suffering is probably like a way to steer something into a path

>>40600557 (OP)
until we into unironical meta lessons. cliche but true

>>40600557 (OP)
Suffering is only a part of life. I don't suffer all the time, do you? I eat a lot of cheesecake though. Life is cheesecake, but why?

>>40603088
He was a pseud

>>40600557 (OP)
Because the world is so dumb and don't know what they doing?