...would you?

>>40603221 (OP)
https://youtu.be/Rxi_SHOre5I

>>40603221 (OP)

>>40603221 (OP)
Is everything about sex for you?

>>40603221 (OP)
Yeah, she has a powerful, sexy energy.

>>40603221 (OP)
>That is NOT a female!

Apparently she did...
And they set her on her way...
Those who did b4 u...

>>40603221 (OP)
brother, what the fuck are you posting.
do not the blavatsky.

>>40603221 (OP)
...would I what?

>>40603221 (OP)
Is she a dyke?

you know i did.

ypu didn't think putin came out of literal fat air did you?
lol no.

but that time came and went she was a visionary and he wasted his gifts and his faith on idealism

>This still affords us no more than the external meaning of the symbols and the allegory. It is now supposed that the name of Prometheus has been unriddled, and the modern mythologists and Orientalists see in it no longer what their fathers saw on the authority of the whole of classical antiquity. They only find therein something far more appropriate to the spirit of the age, namely, a phallic element. But the name of Phoroneus, as well as that of Prometheus, bears not one, nor even two, but a series of esoteric meanings. Both relate to the seven celestial fires; to Agni Abhimânin, his three sons, and their forty-five sons, constituting the forty-nine fires. Do all these numbers relate only to the terrestrial mode of fire and to the flame of sexual passion? Did the Hindu Aryan mind never soar above such purely sensual conceptions? that mind which is declared by Prof. Max Muller to be the most spiritual and mystically inclined on the whole globe? The number of those fires alone ought to have suggested an inkling of the truth.

>>40606412
>We are told that one is no longer permitted, in this age of rational thought, to explain the name of Prometheus as the old Greeks did. The latter, it seems, “basing themselves on the false analogy of promhqeuvß with the verb promanqavnein, saw in him the type of the ‘foreseeing’ man, to whom, for the sake of symmetry, a brother was added — Epimetheus, or ‘he who takes counsel after the event.’ “But now the Orientalists have decided otherwise. They know the real meaning of the two names better than those who invented them.

>The legend is based upon an event of universal importance. It was built “to commemorate a great event which must have strongly impressed itself upon the imagination of the first witnesses to it, and its remembrance has never since faded out from popular memory.” What is it? Laying aside every poetical fiction, all those dreams of the golden age, let us imagine — argue the modern scholars — in all its gross realism, the first miserable state of humanity, the striking picture of which was traced for us after Æschylus by Lucretius, and the exact truth of which is now confirmed by science; and then one may understand better that a new life really began for man, on that day when he saw the first spark produced by the friction of two pieces of wood, or from the veins of a flint. How could man help feeling gratitude to that mysterious and marvellous being which they were henceforth enabled to create at their will, and which was no sooner born, than it grew and expanded, developing with singular power. “This terrestrial flame, was it not analogous in nature to that one which they received from above, or that other which frightened them in the thunderbolt?”

https://youtu.be/GUhVBufwQQY

>>40606420
>“Was it not derived from the same source? And if its origin was in heaven, it must have been brought down some day on earth. If so, who was the powerful being, the beneficent being, god or man, who had conquered it? Such are the questions which the curiosity of the Aryans offered in the early days of their existence, and which found their answer in the myth of Prometheus”; (Mythologie de la Grece Antique, p. 258).

https://youtu.be/939w8RwaLSY

Ayo this nigga Lucifer goated with teh sauce fr