>>40647915>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_bindno, having a "cross to bear" means you're imposed on by the roman structure, not that the "kingdom of heaven is yours."
the kingdom of heaven being yours "by" bearing a cross is itself a double bind, given the messianic conversation was a cultural phenomena of debate and archetyping, it didnt become a titular/mantular thing until rome decided to say
> "lol worship this dead guy, follow in his footsteps and you'll be perfect!"i disagree with the notion that crucifixion is necessary for enlightenment, as it feeds into the imposed fork in the road rome left on the jewish zeitgeist through the crucifixion.
this, in western thought, may very well be the origin of schizofreniform thought, and the reason schizo-umbrella diseases manifest in a much more hostile way than other countries.
having a "cross to bear" means you are to be executed. not to be exalted.
all else is fallacy and propaganda.