Hell is simultaneously a state of being and a place. In the parable of Lazarus and the rich man, we see this to be true. When the rich man is suffering in Hell, Abraham rebukes the rich man, reminding him that he is suffering as a consequence of his own actions. He cries out for water, that the poor man he ignored might bring him water, and the Lord have mercy, because he is suffering. Further, he wants Lazarus to warn his family of the suffering in Hell. On the surface, reasonable requests. Yet, if you really think, the rich man is showing his incredible hubris and disregard for the wrongs he has commited. He does not ask for forgiveness for the wrongs he has commit. He presumes that Lazarus is his to push around, like in life. He wants to ease his own suffering out of his selfish desire. He wants to warn his family not because of any objective morality, but to avoid suffering. The rich man has proven twice that he deserves nothing but Hell. Through his actions we see his nature. He IS Hell, like all those who are "in Hell".
Suffering is an emergent part of consciousness, and suffering is inherently neither "bad" or good. It is necessary. It is a mistake think that suffering is undesirable, or that it can be avoided or stopped. To believe otherwise is hubris.
Why couldn't we be born in heaven? You spiritual nigger, what have you done to deserve heaven?
>>40649533Do you believe in freewill? If so, is it not conceivable that there exist and will exist people who consciously and continuously reject God for all time?
What about the omnipotence and omniscience of God. Is it not possible for God to get the measure of a man?