TLDR: occult / techno / transhumanism version of skull & bones

Posted 2-page doc yesterday, seemed weird but I found it too interesting not to dig deeper.

I found the "main document" that the 2-pager referenced through keyword search on a drive. Idk if its larp but it seems too detailed, look at Part 4

Incomprehensible babble, larp or serious?

https://drive.proton.me/urls/F127YVY8YM#VONe82GDYBOM

https://drive.proton.me/urls/0FYXZWSCDR#ugyEh5EBlUXD

archived threads: >>40652215 >>>/biz/60577780

>>40657619 (OP)
I think it deserves a response in kind, but I also don't want to keep you hanging.

I majored in CS, but unofficially minored in cognitive studies and AI; I went into programming at first *for* AI. While in school I also studied the human brain and psychology.

I've pondered about this "immortality" question and other similar questions for a long time. For example, when I was in grade school I remember thinking that since we could be replicated atomically, that our "soul" doesn't just belong in the material flesh, but that it is also a construct of its environment.

When I took a normal dose of shrooms one day at Delta Chi, my friend's frat, once I saw a field of beings, like wheat, waving at me, everyone on the field, singing the same song that we are one. We are already one. That always stuck around with me. WARNING: don't trip without an experienced sitter, and don't overdo it. Microdosing is enough.

You wouldn't want your toenails to stick around forever, and it's healthy to shed some cells of your own body.

You if you choose, and I, are part of the humanity body, what I could call, the body of Christ, and the stones of the Third Temple. I have no doubt that we will extend our lifetimes. But I don't believe in making copies of the neural structures in the hopes of preserving a soul. I know from what I know of the brain, neuroscience, the infeasibility of storing everything. Anyone who says otherwise is lying. Possibly in a thousand years we might get close, but my other points stand.

Our words and actions speak more to who we are, than what can be measured by the physical body passively. Furthermore I venture to hypothesize that what you want to do with the brain cannot be done by the laws of quantum mechanics. I don't know that as a fact, but it feels right :)

What do you think resurrection means in the Book of Revelation? Have you seen Michael Jackson's new single, Palestine Don't Cry? What writing and legacy will you leave behind?

>>40657724

Why does the book say that the first to be resurrected are the saints?

>>40657619 (OP)
This is good marketing, much better than I do. I'm too honest about it.

>>40657724
Doesn't that confirm what the last page says? Something something those who are valuable will be brought back first

>>40657810
if this is marketing where is the funnel nigga

>>40657619 (OP)
There is no truth in godless 'transhumanism'. Just more illusion.

>>40657839
The saints and martyrs have left behind writing and deeds. No need for brain scans.

I always thought that religion is more than “big dog dude in the sky”. It all might be achievable through tech that is yet inconceivable to us

>>40659351
Technology is the religion of Cain.

>>40657724
your intuition is right, it is not possible to "digitize the soul". its not a technical problem that requires time to solve, it is a logical impossibility because we cannot actually know what the system itself is. all of our understanding of the system is filtered through the spatio-temporal dynamics of our cognition. the world is not our cognition, the world is beyond our cognition, beyond time and space. and thus the material is only an interface to what is real, not the actual thing

>>40659536
Expanding cognition and perception? Just as some are limited by colour blindness or being deaf, with time we managed to expand the perception of those.

What you mention is a (current) limit on the whole of humanity. There’s no way to say “it’s impossible” just as “it’s possible”. People from 200 years ago could not have imagined we can drone strike random people with a joystick or that you can talk to digital avatars of dead people via AI.

I’m not saying I’m agreeing with OP or the manifesto, I’m just saying it CAN be right